Tools & Wizards About Us
m.eonline.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 3

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    20% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

m.eonline.com

Entertainment News, Celebrity News, Celebrity Gossip - E! Online

Page Load Speed

958 ms in total

First Response

55 ms

Resources Loaded

805 ms

Page Rendered

98 ms

m.eonline.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to m.eonline.com homepage info - get ready to check M E Online best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about m.eonline.com

Your source for entertainment news, celebrities, celeb news, and celebrity gossip. Check out the hottest fashion, photos, movies and TV shows!

Visit m.eonline.com

Key Findings

We analyzed M.eonline.com page load time and found that the first response time was 55 ms and then it took 903 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

m.eonline.com performance score

3

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value28.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value26.6 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value9,240 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.786

5/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value48.7 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.eonline.com

55 ms

431.8ed982c8956f355ade7c.css

25 ms

home.468380c001140fa76125.css

27 ms

ListWidget.138.57f79fc49fdc68814b39.css

50 ms

Gallery.249.1bfa4c2897e9b19d363c.css

51 ms

Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original M.eonline.com, 19% (14 requests) were made to Assets.adobedtm.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (223 ms) relates to the external source Eonline.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 755.3 kB (51%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

712.8 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of M.eonline.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 254.8 kB

  • Original 309.4 kB
  • After minification 309.0 kB
  • After compression 54.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 254.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-42%

Potential reduce by 469.0 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 642.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 469.0 kB or 42% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 31.5 kB

  • Original 47.4 kB
  • After minification 47.1 kB
  • After compression 15.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. M.eonline.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 31.5 kB or 66% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 58 (89%)

Requests Now

65

After Optimization

7

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of M E Online. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 52 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.eonline.com

www.eonline.com

55 ms

431.8ed982c8956f355ade7c.css

431.8ed982c8956f355ade7c.css

25 ms

home.468380c001140fa76125.css

home.468380c001140fa76125.css

27 ms

ListWidget.138.57f79fc49fdc68814b39.css

ListWidget.138.57f79fc49fdc68814b39.css

50 ms

Gallery.249.1bfa4c2897e9b19d363c.css

Gallery.249.1bfa4c2897e9b19d363c.css

51 ms

Video.945.bf09efc1a025fd97b75a.css

Video.945.bf09efc1a025fd97b75a.css

43 ms

Carousel.361.6966eae0b7332db900bb.css

Carousel.361.6966eae0b7332db900bb.css

49 ms

Grid.495.da8c2a78941415cd3e60.css

Grid.495.da8c2a78941415cd3e60.css

43 ms

Nielsen.js

Nielsen.js

96 ms

VisitorAPI.js

VisitorAPI.js

111 ms

MediaSDK.js

MediaSDK.js

94 ms

AppMeasurement.js

AppMeasurement.js

141 ms

tcf.stub.js

tcf.stub.js

97 ms

launch-ENfb0d8c9c83a248f186134c5888716f23.min.js

launch-ENfb0d8c9c83a248f186134c5888716f23.min.js

92 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

22 ms

webpack.runtime.63723f3285411c7af3b9.js

webpack.runtime.63723f3285411c7af3b9.js

52 ms

546.5e86f5734016435ed4d5.js

546.5e86f5734016435ed4d5.js

95 ms

494.6c7d705dfa8f95b06117.js

494.6c7d705dfa8f95b06117.js

88 ms

455.917b929d968f5c6f56d2.js

455.917b929d968f5c6f56d2.js

90 ms

783.b06b0395a6c5ffebb76a.js

783.b06b0395a6c5ffebb76a.js

92 ms

431.213326f4883bfdd714be.js

431.213326f4883bfdd714be.js

99 ms

home.a91eea0e5af2baf54eba.js

home.a91eea0e5af2baf54eba.js

99 ms

common.async.f33ad56626fe4cff1d38.js

common.async.f33ad56626fe4cff1d38.js

91 ms

ListWidget.9441e50d4374f270d44f.js

ListWidget.9441e50d4374f270d44f.js

93 ms

530.c1334ca189ca535a5fee.js

530.c1334ca189ca535a5fee.js

99 ms

Gallery.6d6a0bf137a3f8002e7c.js

Gallery.6d6a0bf137a3f8002e7c.js

93 ms

835.885a8797c37cd0ab3717.js

835.885a8797c37cd0ab3717.js

223 ms

Video.705d8a8db3a6570336d8.js

Video.705d8a8db3a6570336d8.js

115 ms

Carousel.f5ee3ae15cfad62a09a0.js

Carousel.f5ee3ae15cfad62a09a0.js

111 ms

Grid.6f8993adea09eb27c437.js

Grid.6f8993adea09eb27c437.js

129 ms

streamingtag_plugin_jwplayer.js

streamingtag_plugin_jwplayer.js

5 ms

load-e-web.js

load-e-web.js

40 ms

css

css

35 ms

sprite.fa05c9a313d5d05c7aaee48680dc3247.svg

sprite.fa05c9a313d5d05c7aaee48680dc3247.svg

66 ms

AppMeasurement.min.js

AppMeasurement.min.js

47 ms

AppMeasurement_Module_ActivityMap.min.js

AppMeasurement_Module_ActivityMap.min.js

97 ms

pixel.gif

pixel.gif

166 ms

RC9b31c791c50e474da116ef4a0c5007d7-source.min.js

RC9b31c791c50e474da116ef4a0c5007d7-source.min.js

61 ms

js

js

124 ms

RC4b63822a89294fa8a3370ff88ae2466a-source.min.js

RC4b63822a89294fa8a3370ff88ae2466a-source.min.js

74 ms

RC904f3d98b66c47e09b0f951e6a1f8e75-source.min.js

RC904f3d98b66c47e09b0f951e6a1f8e75-source.min.js

83 ms

RC042d27247f374e1694b95d0c75e5665b-source.min.js

RC042d27247f374e1694b95d0c75e5665b-source.min.js

83 ms

RC1c7bf6f4b9314d19b994281cb401a9fb-source.min.js

RC1c7bf6f4b9314d19b994281cb401a9fb-source.min.js

81 ms

RC0248437282e84503b37e263982c6d5e3-source.min.js

RC0248437282e84503b37e263982c6d5e3-source.min.js

81 ms

RC15c3ff42debd4c9791b89be4909e7c3c-source.min.js

RC15c3ff42debd4c9791b89be4909e7c3c-source.min.js

81 ms

RC8e3a3a67e9df4431913f38f68f685eab-source.min.js

RC8e3a3a67e9df4431913f38f68f685eab-source.min.js

90 ms

RC35e4c0d815fb4b9bae0193780ec605c8-source.min.js

RC35e4c0d815fb4b9bae0193780ec605c8-source.min.js

90 ms

RC327558f10a4b45bb85bc0c642655f547-source.min.js

RC327558f10a4b45bb85bc0c642655f547-source.min.js

92 ms

RC405fd372d27040caa7e63fe7da077172-source.min.js

RC405fd372d27040caa7e63fe7da077172-source.min.js

92 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

46 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

57 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

65 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

87 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

86 ms

nbcuniversal.js

nbcuniversal.js

57 ms

ta-pagesocial-sdk.js

ta-pagesocial-sdk.js

21 ms

mparticle.js

mparticle.js

28 ms

websdk.appsflyer.com

websdk.appsflyer.com

22 ms

chartbeat.js

chartbeat.js

29 ms

otCCPAiab.js

otCCPAiab.js

21 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

33 ms

ping

ping

34 ms

dnsfeed

dnsfeed

64 ms

tfa.js

tfa.js

30 ms

identify

identify

25 ms

i.js

i.js

88 ms

json

json

58 ms

pixel

pixel

63 ms

obtp.js

obtp.js

44 ms

a-01y3.min.js

a-01y3.min.js

39 ms

cds-pips.js

cds-pips.js

6 ms

pixel

pixel

41 ms

runtime_6459738026535cda4232dc813c61447d.js

runtime_6459738026535cda4232dc813c61447d.js

54 ms

main-v2_f01faeed4f261176a71666567394c61a.js

main-v2_f01faeed4f261176a71666567394c61a.js

11 ms

Accessibility Review

m.eonline.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

m.eonline.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

m.eonline.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise M.eonline.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that M.eonline.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

m.eonline.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of M E Online. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: