Tools & Wizards About Us
nuclear-energy.energytechreview.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 76

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    35% of websites

nuclear-energy.energytechreview.com

Energy Tech Review: Technology Magazine for Energy Industry

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

129 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

167 ms

nuclear-energy.energytechreview.com screenshot

About Website

Visit nuclear-energy.energytechreview.com now to see the best up-to-date Nuclear Energy Tech Review content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about nuclear-energy.energytechreview.com

Energy Tech Review is a print and digital magazine that aggregates the brightest of minds, expert opinions, latest energy technologies news, analyses, and argument about the critical issues that exist...

Visit nuclear-energy.energytechreview.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Nuclear-energy.energytechreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 129 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

nuclear-energy.energytechreview.com performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

45/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

9/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.1 s

61/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,770 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.8 s

17/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

nuclear-energy.energytechreview.com

129 ms

nuclear-energy.energytechreview.com

587 ms

bootstrap.css

320 ms

font-awesome.min.css

273 ms

animate.css

283 ms

Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 15% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Nuclear-energy.energytechreview.com, 50% (40 requests) were made to Energytechreview.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (685 ms) relates to the external source Energytechreview.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 243.8 kB (20%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

957.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Nuclear-energy.energytechreview.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 829.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 60.0 kB

  • Original 78.0 kB
  • After minification 77.3 kB
  • After compression 18.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 60.0 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 4.4 kB

  • Original 234.2 kB
  • After minification 229.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Nuclear Energy Tech Review images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 162.2 kB

  • Original 829.6 kB
  • After minification 829.0 kB
  • After compression 667.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 162.2 kB or 20% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 17.2 kB

  • Original 59.6 kB
  • After minification 52.6 kB
  • After compression 42.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nuclear-energy.energytechreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 17.2 kB or 29% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (64%)

Requests Now

70

After Optimization

25

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nuclear Energy Tech Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

nuclear-energy.energytechreview.com

nuclear-energy.energytechreview.com

129 ms

nuclear-energy.energytechreview.com

nuclear-energy.energytechreview.com

587 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

320 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

273 ms

animate.css

animate.css

283 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

287 ms

owl.theme.default.css

owl.theme.default.css

280 ms

normalize.css

normalize.css

289 ms

slicknav.min.css

slicknav.min.css

334 ms

style1.css

style1.css

119 ms

main.css

main.css

342 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

346 ms

modernizr-3.5.0.min.js

modernizr-3.5.0.min.js

351 ms

css

css

46 ms

css

css

86 ms

css

css

85 ms

js

js

88 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

108 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

125 ms

element.js

element.js

84 ms

new_region.css

new_region.css

486 ms

style.css

style.css

124 ms

jQuery.verticalCarousel.css

jQuery.verticalCarousel.css

160 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

40 ms

jQuery.verticalCarousel.js

jQuery.verticalCarousel.js

179 ms

jquery.flipbox.css

jquery.flipbox.css

184 ms

cube_slider.css

cube_slider.css

184 ms

jquery.flipbox.js

jquery.flipbox.js

189 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

534 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

535 ms

jquery.waypoints.min.js

jquery.waypoints.min.js

534 ms

jquery.slicknav.min.js

jquery.slicknav.min.js

533 ms

masonry.pkgd.min.js

masonry.pkgd.min.js

534 ms

main.js

main.js

534 ms

smart-sticky.js

smart-sticky.js

685 ms

theia-sticky-sidebar.js

theia-sticky-sidebar.js

685 ms

jquery_cookie.js

jquery_cookie.js

684 ms

custom.js

custom.js

684 ms

jquery.easy-ticker.js

jquery.easy-ticker.js

684 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

224 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

223 ms

atrk.js

atrk.js

116 ms

Final-Logo.png

Final-Logo.png

219 ms

load.gif

load.gif

371 ms

450x308_M9D0.jpg

450x308_M9D0.jpg

398 ms

450x308_xA7r.jpg

450x308_xA7r.jpg

399 ms

n79il300400.jpg

n79il300400.jpg

464 ms

lwjpzUntitled-25.webp

lwjpzUntitled-25.webp

441 ms

450x308_f851.jpg

450x308_f851.jpg

398 ms

450x308_l9s8.jpg

450x308_l9s8.jpg

396 ms

450x308_Y4iV.webp

450x308_Y4iV.webp

464 ms

9253q300r.jpg

9253q300r.jpg

457 ms

450x308_7AF5.jpg

450x308_7AF5.jpg

456 ms

450x308_f087.jpg

450x308_f087.jpg

463 ms

450x308_Vi3L.jpg

450x308_Vi3L.jpg

535 ms

x.png

x.png

536 ms

linkedin_cirr.png

linkedin_cirr.png

215 ms

pubads_impl.js

pubads_impl.js

154 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

503 ms

zrt_lookup_nohtml.html

zrt_lookup_nohtml.html

261 ms

jizDREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTiUf2zE.woff

jizDREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTiUf2zE.woff

185 ms

jizAREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTi3s-CI0q10.woff

jizAREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTi3s-CI0q10.woff

201 ms

jizAREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTi20-SI0q10.woff

jizAREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTi20-SI0q10.woff

474 ms

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtU.woff

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtU.woff

178 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

318 ms

collect

collect

158 ms

css

css

84 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

95 ms

ads

ads

101 ms

container.html

container.html

71 ms

js

js

68 ms

lwjpzUntitled-25.webp

lwjpzUntitled-25.webp

83 ms

298272945196813125

298272945196813125

214 ms

icon.png

icon.png

127 ms

abg_lite.js

abg_lite.js

214 ms

window_focus.js

window_focus.js

214 ms

ufs_web_display.js

ufs_web_display.js

127 ms

450x308_Y4iV.webp

450x308_Y4iV.webp

123 ms

icon-up.png

icon-up.png

123 ms

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

161 ms

Accessibility Review

nuclear-energy.energytechreview.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

nuclear-energy.energytechreview.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

nuclear-energy.energytechreview.com SEO score

76

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nuclear-energy.energytechreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Nuclear-energy.energytechreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

nuclear-energy.energytechreview.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Nuclear Energy Tech Review. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: