Tools & Wizards About Us
power-plant-tech-2021.energytechreview.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

power-plant-tech-2021.energytechreview.com

Energy Tech Review: Technology Magazine for Energy Industry

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

135 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

71 ms

power-plant-tech-2021.energytechreview.com screenshot

About Website

Visit power-plant-tech-2021.energytechreview.com now to see the best up-to-date Powerplant Tech 2021 Energy Review content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about power-plant-tech-2021.energytechreview.com

Energy Tech Review is a print and digital magazine that aggregates the brightest of minds, expert opinions, latest energy technologies news, analyses, and argument about the critical issues that exist...

Visit power-plant-tech-2021.energytechreview.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Power-plant-tech-2021.energytechreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 135 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

power-plant-tech-2021.energytechreview.com performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

53/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

44/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.8 s

67/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,960 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.005

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.4 s

24/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

power-plant-tech-2021.energytechreview.com

135 ms

power-plant-tech-2021.energytechreview.com

554 ms

bootstrap.css

339 ms

font-awesome.min.css

272 ms

animate.css

286 ms

Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 10% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Power-plant-tech-2021.energytechreview.com, 44% (27 requests) were made to Energytechreview.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (643 ms) relates to the external source Energytechreview.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 71.2 kB (9%)

Content Size

771.5 kB

After Optimization

700.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Power-plant-tech-2021.energytechreview.com main page is 771.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 636.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 44.6 kB

  • Original 59.0 kB
  • After minification 58.4 kB
  • After compression 14.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.6 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 3.4 kB

  • Original 18.2 kB
  • After minification 14.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Powerplant Tech 2021 Energy Review needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.4 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 6.2 kB

  • Original 636.3 kB
  • After minification 636.2 kB
  • After compression 630.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 16.9 kB

  • Original 58.0 kB
  • After minification 51.0 kB
  • After compression 41.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Power-plant-tech-2021.energytechreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 16.9 kB or 29% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (75%)

Requests Now

51

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Powerplant Tech 2021 Energy Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

power-plant-tech-2021.energytechreview.com

power-plant-tech-2021.energytechreview.com

135 ms

power-plant-tech-2021.energytechreview.com

power-plant-tech-2021.energytechreview.com

554 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

339 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

272 ms

animate.css

animate.css

286 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

282 ms

owl.theme.default.css

owl.theme.default.css

283 ms

normalize.css

normalize.css

289 ms

slicknav.min.css

slicknav.min.css

332 ms

style1.css

style1.css

86 ms

main.css

main.css

348 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

352 ms

modernizr-3.5.0.min.js

modernizr-3.5.0.min.js

356 ms

css

css

57 ms

css

css

84 ms

css

css

97 ms

js

js

87 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

139 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

166 ms

element.js

element.js

86 ms

new_region.css

new_region.css

501 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

581 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

501 ms

jquery.waypoints.min.js

jquery.waypoints.min.js

580 ms

jquery.slicknav.min.js

jquery.slicknav.min.js

580 ms

masonry.pkgd.min.js

masonry.pkgd.min.js

579 ms

main.js

main.js

579 ms

smart-sticky.js

smart-sticky.js

579 ms

theia-sticky-sidebar.js

theia-sticky-sidebar.js

642 ms

jquery_cookie.js

jquery_cookie.js

643 ms

custom.js

custom.js

643 ms

jquery.easy-ticker.js

jquery.easy-ticker.js

642 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

263 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

447 ms

atrk.js

atrk.js

198 ms

Final-Logo.png

Final-Logo.png

201 ms

load.gif

load.gif

381 ms

x.png

x.png

264 ms

linkedin_cirr.png

linkedin_cirr.png

265 ms

pubads_impl.js

pubads_impl.js

199 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

351 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

269 ms

jizDREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTiUf2zIZiVbJ.ttf

jizDREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTiUf2zIZiVbJ.ttf

237 ms

jizAREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTi3s-CI0q17jitOh.ttf

jizAREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTi3s-CI0q17jitOh.ttf

253 ms

jizAREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTi20-SI0q17jitOh.ttf

jizAREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTi20-SI0q17jitOh.ttf

319 ms

css

css

178 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

261 ms

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtbK-F2qO0g.ttf

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtbK-F2qO0g.ttf

260 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

175 ms

collect

collect

161 ms

ads

ads

159 ms

container.html

container.html

160 ms

js

js

137 ms

ads

ads

101 ms

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

101 ms

16126521053395641330

16126521053395641330

229 ms

icon.png

icon.png

224 ms

abg_lite.js

abg_lite.js

230 ms

window_focus.js

window_focus.js

230 ms

ufs_web_display.js

ufs_web_display.js

41 ms

icon-up.png

icon-up.png

91 ms

Accessibility Review

power-plant-tech-2021.energytechreview.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

power-plant-tech-2021.energytechreview.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

power-plant-tech-2021.energytechreview.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Power-plant-tech-2021.energytechreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Power-plant-tech-2021.energytechreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

power-plant-tech-2021.energytechreview.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Powerplant Tech 2021 Energy Review. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: