Tools & Wizards About Us
r.mail.emaze.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

r.mail.emaze.com

Brevo | CRM Suite

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

109 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

233 ms

r.mail.emaze.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing R Mail Emaze content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about r.mail.emaze.com

Brevo helps you grow your business. Build customer relationships across email, SMS, chat, and more. Use the tools you need, when you need them. Try it for free.

Visit r.mail.emaze.com

Key Findings

We analyzed R.mail.emaze.com page load time and found that the first response time was 109 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

r.mail.emaze.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

55/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.8 s

49/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,050 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.159

73/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.2 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.brevo.com

109 ms

gtm.js

328 ms

j.php

49 ms

609e520e1cf47625.css

84 ms

7e3762db088d555c.css

82 ms

Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original R.mail.emaze.com, 26% (21 requests) were made to Brevo.com and 10% (8 requests) were made to Cdn.cookielaw.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (495 ms) relates to the external source Metrics.brevo.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 311.0 kB (35%)

Content Size

888.2 kB

After Optimization

577.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of R.mail.emaze.com main page is 888.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 353.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 301.8 kB

  • Original 352.1 kB
  • After minification 351.9 kB
  • After compression 50.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 301.8 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 353.9 kB
  • After minification 352.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. R Mail Emaze images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 7.6 kB

  • Original 178.0 kB
  • After minification 178.0 kB
  • After compression 170.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2 B

  • Original 4.3 kB
  • After minification 4.3 kB
  • After compression 4.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. R.mail.emaze.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (59%)

Requests Now

79

After Optimization

32

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of R Mail Emaze. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.brevo.com

www.brevo.com

109 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

328 ms

j.php

j.php

49 ms

609e520e1cf47625.css

609e520e1cf47625.css

84 ms

7e3762db088d555c.css

7e3762db088d555c.css

82 ms

48853dbae3b54e21.css

48853dbae3b54e21.css

61 ms

30ebbf902514d8de.css

30ebbf902514d8de.css

87 ms

polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js

polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js

65 ms

fingerprint.js

fingerprint.js

91 ms

webpack-80862089c9161b11.js

webpack-80862089c9161b11.js

54 ms

framework-ce84985cd166733a.js

framework-ce84985cd166733a.js

92 ms

main-71e3bf73365eb8ba.js

main-71e3bf73365eb8ba.js

96 ms

_app-65533ef008c3e054.js

_app-65533ef008c3e054.js

98 ms

fdcf5922-dadc88233c699058.js

fdcf5922-dadc88233c699058.js

96 ms

2627-90ae83ebe59c9359.js

2627-90ae83ebe59c9359.js

101 ms

3438-b4789b2f906fa5d3.js

3438-b4789b2f906fa5d3.js

100 ms

2561-5f47a3233c01a004.js

2561-5f47a3233c01a004.js

96 ms

5281-c31b207feacdcbea.js

5281-c31b207feacdcbea.js

104 ms

8980-c587b6c3b666212a.js

8980-c587b6c3b666212a.js

139 ms

5243-e037c365e431b873.js

5243-e037c365e431b873.js

116 ms

index-190a3affac8aef4b.js

index-190a3affac8aef4b.js

113 ms

_buildManifest.js

_buildManifest.js

128 ms

_ssgManifest.js

_ssgManifest.js

135 ms

Vector.svg

Vector.svg

115 ms

Vector-1.svg

Vector-1.svg

161 ms

Brevo64.svg

Brevo64.svg

156 ms

TransactionalEmails-64.svg

TransactionalEmails-64.svg

160 ms

Conversations-64-1.svg

Conversations-64-1.svg

174 ms

CDP-1.svg

CDP-1.svg

147 ms

blog_header_2x.webp

blog_header_2x.webp

181 ms

LouisVuitton.svg

LouisVuitton.svg

164 ms

Tissot.svg

Tissot.svg

189 ms

Stripe.svg

Stripe.svg

176 ms

ebay-1.svg

ebay-1.svg

217 ms

Amnesty.svg

Amnesty.svg

187 ms

Michelin-1.svg

Michelin-1.svg

209 ms

MarketingPlatform-64-4.svg

MarketingPlatform-64-4.svg

212 ms

SalesCRM-64-1.svg

SalesCRM-64-1.svg

198 ms

Conversations-40-3.svg

Conversations-40-3.svg

240 ms

TransactionalEmails-64-3.svg

TransactionalEmails-64-3.svg

209 ms

marketing-automation-ebook-preview.webp

marketing-automation-ebook-preview.webp

221 ms

best_of_2023_3dgradient_1_1-300x300-1.webp

best_of_2023_3dgradient_1_1-300x300-1.webp

248 ms

martech_breakthrough_awards_2023_brevo_1_-300x292-1.webp

martech_breakthrough_awards_2023_brevo_1_-300x292-1.webp

254 ms

thesammy_2023_award_logo-300x247-1.webp

thesammy_2023_award_logo-300x247-1.webp

248 ms

marketingautomation_leader_mid_market_leader-265x300-1.webp

marketingautomation_leader_mid_market_leader-265x300-1.webp

246 ms

sascs23_gold_winner_1-2-300x293-1.webp

sascs23_gold_winner_1-2-300x293-1.webp

244 ms

marketingautomation_leader_small_business_leader-264x300-1.webp

marketingautomation_leader_small_business_leader-264x300-1.webp

278 ms

G2-original-1.svg

G2-original-1.svg

283 ms

Capterra-original-1.svg

Capterra-original-1.svg

280 ms

Gartner-original-1.svg

Gartner-original-1.svg

278 ms

ai_camp-300x122-1.webp

ai_camp-300x122-1.webp

263 ms

stripe.webp

stripe.webp

289 ms

am.webp

am.webp

291 ms

intercom.webp

intercom.webp

406 ms

yotpo.webp

yotpo.webp

352 ms

zoom.webp

zoom.webp

353 ms

zendesk.webp

zendesk.webp

354 ms

n_n.webp

n_n.webp

353 ms

202 ms

v84a3a4012de94ce1a686ba8c167c359c1696973893317

v84a3a4012de94ce1a686ba8c167c359c1696973893317

87 ms

5309a9e03cf153ec184a.css

5309a9e03cf153ec184a.css

37 ms

js

js

495 ms

kn.min.js

kn.min.js

88 ms

bat.js

bat.js

36 ms

insight.min.js

insight.min.js

36 ms

landing

landing

98 ms

js

js

60 ms

tapfiliate.js

tapfiliate.js

34 ms

sha256.min.js

sha256.min.js

29 ms

otSDKStub.js

otSDKStub.js

30 ms

3ecea6e2-250b-4ec3-bbdb-850b58d2d925.json

3ecea6e2-250b-4ec3-bbdb-850b58d2d925.json

21 ms

polyfill.js

polyfill.js

411 ms

otBannerSdk.js

otBannerSdk.js

15 ms

en.json

en.json

22 ms

destination

destination

65 ms

otFlat.json

otFlat.json

13 ms

otPcTab.json

otPcTab.json

22 ms

otCommonStyles.css

otCommonStyles.css

127 ms

li_sync

li_sync

15 ms

Logo_(6).png

Logo_(6).png

107 ms

collect

collect

293 ms

Accessibility Review

r.mail.emaze.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

r.mail.emaze.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

r.mail.emaze.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise R.mail.emaze.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that R.mail.emaze.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

r.mail.emaze.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of R Mail Emaze. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: