811 ms in total
13 ms
538 ms
260 ms
Visit retail-index.emarketer.com now to see the best up-to-date Retail Index EMARKETER content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about retail-index.emarketer.com
Browse Retail & Ecommerce Articles featuring EMARKETER's latest data and insights on digital marketing.
Visit retail-index.emarketer.comWe analyzed Retail-index.emarketer.com page load time and found that the first response time was 13 ms and then it took 798 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
retail-index.emarketer.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
62/100
10%
Value2.8 s
83/100
25%
Value10.8 s
6/100
10%
Value4,000 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value22.5 s
1/100
10%
13 ms
28 ms
108 ms
40 ms
72 ms
Our browser made a total of 25 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Retail-index.emarketer.com, 60% (15 requests) were made to Emarketer.com and 28% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.emarketer.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (438 ms) relates to the external source Emarketer.com.
Page size can be reduced by 251.8 kB (72%)
352.0 kB
100.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Retail-index.emarketer.com main page is 352.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 211.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 171.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 171.0 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 72.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 72.8 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Retail-index.emarketer.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 8.0 kB or 21% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (89%)
18
2
The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Retail Index EMARKETER. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
retail-index.emarketer.com
13 ms
retail-ecommerce
28 ms
fonts.css
108 ms
all.css
40 ms
harvester.min.js
72 ms
7eff9a7b3253c8e4.css
13 ms
polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js
438 ms
webpack-c3c17c26c6b29705.js
13 ms
framework-2c79e2a64abdb08b.js
63 ms
main-5282b4f950aac7f6.js
13 ms
_app-519c9b5d27411e4c.js
18 ms
3cdde266-f09b4668955f26a8.js
36 ms
508-2576c75cf7be9472.js
18 ms
37-0497e533c649ee06.js
20 ms
280-1b42bb0e421ff870.js
30 ms
topic-2c8cce8a744dc9ac.js
23 ms
_buildManifest.js
31 ms
_ssgManifest.js
33 ms
evergage.min.js
21 ms
fonts.css
10 ms
labgrotesque-bold.woff
7 ms
labgrotesque-black.woff
11 ms
labgrotesque-medium.woff
10 ms
labgrotesque-regular.woff
10 ms
labgrotesque-light.woff
11 ms
retail-index.emarketer.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
retail-index.emarketer.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Retail-index.emarketer.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Retail-index.emarketer.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
retail-index.emarketer.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Retail Index EMARKETER. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: