Access rmc.edu.ru. Институт повышения квалификации

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

66/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

16/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.1 s

14/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,920 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.063

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.4 s

5/100

10%

rmc.edu.ru

1064 ms

bootstrap.min.css

272 ms

font-awesome.min.css

278 ms

frontend.css

314 ms

style.css

315 ms

Our browser made a total of 96 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (88 requests) were addressed to the original Rmc.edu.ru, 3% (3 requests) were made to Mc.yandex.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Rmc.edu.ru.

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Rmc.edu.ru main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 81.7 kB

Original 97.7 kB
After minification 84.0 kB
After compression 16.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.7 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 81.7 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 191.1 kB

Original 1.7 MB
After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rmc Edu needs image optimization as it can save up to 191.1 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 9.1 kB

Original 250.4 kB
After minification 245.2 kB
After compression 241.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

Original 45.8 kB
After minification 45.8 kB
After compression 43.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rmc.edu.ru has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 93 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rmc Edu. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

ARIA toggle fields do not have accessible names

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

RU
Language Claimed

RU
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rmc.edu.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rmc.edu.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rmc.edu.ru

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rmc Edu. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

Институт повышения квалификации - РМЦПК «ИПК-РМЦПК»

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Network Requests Diagram

rmc.edu.ru

bootstrap.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

frontend.css

style.css

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Content Size

After Optimization

HTML Optimization

Image Optimization

JavaScript Optimization

CSS Optimization

Requests Breakdown

Requests Now

After Optimization

Network Requests Diagram

rmc.edu.ru

bootstrap.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

frontend.css

style.css

jquery.min.js

js

form.js

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

jquery.validate.min.js

slick.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery.popSelect.min.js

scripts.js

jquery.fancybox.css

slick.css

slick-theme.css

jquery-ui.min.css

jquery.popSelect.min.css

wp-emoji-release.min.js

cross_white50.png

logo.png

vk.png

shadow-1170.png

phpThumb.php

phpThumb.php

phpThumb.php

phpThumb.php

phpThumb.php

phpThumb.php

phpThumb.php

phpThumb.php

phpThumb.php

phpThumb.php

phpThumb.php

phpThumb.php

phpThumb.php

phpThumb.php

phpThumb.php

phpThumb.php

phpThumb.php

phpThumb.php