Tools & Wizards About Us
smart-energy.energytechreview.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 76

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    35% of websites

smart-energy.energytechreview.com

Energy Tech Review: Technology Magazine for Energy Industry

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

130 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

192 ms

smart-energy.energytechreview.com screenshot

About Website

Visit smart-energy.energytechreview.com now to see the best up-to-date Smart Energy Tech Review content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about smart-energy.energytechreview.com

Energy Tech Review is a print and digital magazine that aggregates the brightest of minds, expert opinions, latest energy technologies news, analyses, and argument about the critical issues that exist...

Visit smart-energy.energytechreview.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Smart-energy.energytechreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 130 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

smart-energy.energytechreview.com performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

45/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

9/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.5 s

54/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,700 ms

11/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.249

50/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.2 s

19/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

smart-energy.energytechreview.com

130 ms

smart-energy.energytechreview.com

581 ms

bootstrap.css

491 ms

font-awesome.min.css

344 ms

animate.css

410 ms

Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 15% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original Smart-energy.energytechreview.com, 58% (43 requests) were made to Energytechreview.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (720 ms) relates to the external source Energytechreview.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 87.8 kB (13%)

Content Size

659.5 kB

After Optimization

571.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Smart-energy.energytechreview.com main page is 659.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 417.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 57.3 kB

  • Original 74.1 kB
  • After minification 73.4 kB
  • After compression 16.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.3 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 3.5 kB

  • Original 103.6 kB
  • After minification 100.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Smart Energy Tech Review images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 5.0 kB

  • Original 417.4 kB
  • After minification 417.4 kB
  • After compression 412.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-34%

Potential reduce by 22.0 kB

  • Original 64.5 kB
  • After minification 55.8 kB
  • After compression 42.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Smart-energy.energytechreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 22.0 kB or 34% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (61%)

Requests Now

67

After Optimization

26

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Smart Energy Tech Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

smart-energy.energytechreview.com

smart-energy.energytechreview.com

130 ms

smart-energy.energytechreview.com

smart-energy.energytechreview.com

581 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

491 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

344 ms

animate.css

animate.css

410 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

284 ms

owl.theme.default.css

owl.theme.default.css

286 ms

normalize.css

normalize.css

293 ms

slicknav.min.css

slicknav.min.css

344 ms

style1.css

style1.css

126 ms

main.css

main.css

405 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

356 ms

modernizr-3.5.0.min.js

modernizr-3.5.0.min.js

401 ms

css

css

49 ms

css

css

87 ms

css

css

88 ms

js

js

95 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

133 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

165 ms

element.js

element.js

88 ms

new_region.css

new_region.css

399 ms

style.css

style.css

131 ms

jQuery.verticalCarousel.css

jQuery.verticalCarousel.css

164 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

51 ms

jQuery.verticalCarousel.js

jQuery.verticalCarousel.js

179 ms

jquery.flipbox.css

jquery.flipbox.css

187 ms

cube_slider.css

cube_slider.css

192 ms

jquery.flipbox.js

jquery.flipbox.js

200 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

720 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

593 ms

jquery.waypoints.min.js

jquery.waypoints.min.js

402 ms

jquery.slicknav.min.js

jquery.slicknav.min.js

406 ms

masonry.pkgd.min.js

masonry.pkgd.min.js

407 ms

main.js

main.js

592 ms

smart-sticky.js

smart-sticky.js

593 ms

theia-sticky-sidebar.js

theia-sticky-sidebar.js

593 ms

jquery_cookie.js

jquery_cookie.js

717 ms

custom.js

custom.js

716 ms

jquery.easy-ticker.js

jquery.easy-ticker.js

715 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

264 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

376 ms

atrk.js

atrk.js

137 ms

Final-Logo.png

Final-Logo.png

259 ms

load.gif

load.gif

257 ms

450x308_RxT3.jpg

450x308_RxT3.jpg

259 ms

450x308_7I0f.jpg

450x308_7I0f.jpg

372 ms

pjc4w300400.jpg

pjc4w300400.jpg

370 ms

llzjqsm.webp

llzjqsm.webp

368 ms

450x308_iUWz.jpg

450x308_iUWz.jpg

367 ms

450x308_9sg6.webp

450x308_9sg6.webp

366 ms

450x308_ilWg.webp

450x308_ilWg.webp

368 ms

oa9s5energyranking.jpg

oa9s5energyranking.jpg

372 ms

450x308_1WR6.webp

450x308_1WR6.webp

373 ms

450x308_o3AU.jpg

450x308_o3AU.jpg

371 ms

450x308_8xNI.webp

450x308_8xNI.webp

372 ms

x.png

x.png

372 ms

linkedin_cirr.png

linkedin_cirr.png

255 ms

pubads_impl.js

pubads_impl.js

177 ms

font

font

153 ms

font

font

108 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

114 ms

collect

collect

172 ms

css

css

77 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

87 ms

ads

ads

139 ms

container.html

container.html

55 ms

js

js

48 ms

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

125 ms

llzjqsm.webp

llzjqsm.webp

89 ms

450x308_9sg6.webp

450x308_9sg6.webp

110 ms

450x308_ilWg.webp

450x308_ilWg.webp

109 ms

450x308_1WR6.webp

450x308_1WR6.webp

106 ms

450x308_8xNI.webp

450x308_8xNI.webp

107 ms

icon-up.png

icon-up.png

106 ms

Accessibility Review

smart-energy.energytechreview.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

smart-energy.energytechreview.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

smart-energy.energytechreview.com SEO score

76

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Smart-energy.energytechreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Smart-energy.energytechreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

smart-energy.energytechreview.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Smart Energy Tech Review. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: