Tools & Wizards About Us
solar-energy.energytechreview.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    41% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 76

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    35% of websites

solar-energy.energytechreview.com

Energy Tech Review: Technology Magazine for Energy Industry

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

125 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

299 ms

solar-energy.energytechreview.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Solar Energy Tech Review content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about solar-energy.energytechreview.com

Energy Tech Review is a print and digital magazine that aggregates the brightest of minds, expert opinions, latest energy technologies news, analyses, and argument about the critical issues that exist...

Visit solar-energy.energytechreview.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Solar-energy.energytechreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 125 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

solar-energy.energytechreview.com performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

46/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.9 s

7/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.9 s

47/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,850 ms

9/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.247

50/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.5 s

18/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

solar-energy.energytechreview.com

125 ms

solar-energy.energytechreview.com

672 ms

bootstrap.css

304 ms

font-awesome.min.css

252 ms

animate.css

263 ms

Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 13% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Solar-energy.energytechreview.com, 54% (49 requests) were made to Energytechreview.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (672 ms) belongs to the original domain Solar-energy.energytechreview.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 183.3 kB (14%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Solar-energy.energytechreview.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 683.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 69.1 kB

  • Original 88.5 kB
  • After minification 87.8 kB
  • After compression 19.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 69.1 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 4.4 kB

  • Original 521.5 kB
  • After minification 517.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Solar Energy Tech Review images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 88.8 kB

  • Original 683.2 kB
  • After minification 679.2 kB
  • After compression 594.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 88.8 kB or 13% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 21.1 kB

  • Original 63.5 kB
  • After minification 55.1 kB
  • After compression 42.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Solar-energy.energytechreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 21.1 kB or 33% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (56%)

Requests Now

80

After Optimization

35

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Solar Energy Tech Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

solar-energy.energytechreview.com

solar-energy.energytechreview.com

125 ms

solar-energy.energytechreview.com

solar-energy.energytechreview.com

672 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

304 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

252 ms

animate.css

animate.css

263 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

274 ms

owl.theme.default.css

owl.theme.default.css

279 ms

normalize.css

normalize.css

282 ms

slicknav.min.css

slicknav.min.css

311 ms

style1.css

style1.css

145 ms

main.css

main.css

325 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

336 ms

modernizr-3.5.0.min.js

modernizr-3.5.0.min.js

345 ms

css

css

52 ms

css

css

81 ms

css

css

81 ms

js

js

80 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

127 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

162 ms

element.js

element.js

81 ms

new_region.css

new_region.css

375 ms

style.css

style.css

144 ms

jQuery.verticalCarousel.css

jQuery.verticalCarousel.css

146 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

38 ms

jQuery.verticalCarousel.js

jQuery.verticalCarousel.js

190 ms

jquery.flipbox.css

jquery.flipbox.css

192 ms

cube_slider.css

cube_slider.css

192 ms

jquery.flipbox.js

jquery.flipbox.js

202 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

445 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

443 ms

jquery.waypoints.min.js

jquery.waypoints.min.js

445 ms

jquery.slicknav.min.js

jquery.slicknav.min.js

511 ms

masonry.pkgd.min.js

masonry.pkgd.min.js

511 ms

main.js

main.js

509 ms

smart-sticky.js

smart-sticky.js

510 ms

theia-sticky-sidebar.js

theia-sticky-sidebar.js

509 ms

jquery_cookie.js

jquery_cookie.js

510 ms

custom.js

custom.js

543 ms

jquery.easy-ticker.js

jquery.easy-ticker.js

542 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

239 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

372 ms

atrk.js

atrk.js

139 ms

Final-Logo.png

Final-Logo.png

204 ms

load.gif

load.gif

237 ms

450x308_FqZW.jpg

450x308_FqZW.jpg

371 ms

450x308_b0X9.jpg

450x308_b0X9.jpg

236 ms

lcot51.jpg

lcot51.jpg

406 ms

s3o6uUntitled-26.jpg

s3o6uUntitled-26.jpg

369 ms

eclsc400.jpg

eclsc400.jpg

370 ms

su6c83004008494.jpg

su6c83004008494.jpg

385 ms

450x308_9sg6.webp

450x308_9sg6.webp

368 ms

450x308_xA7r.jpg

450x308_xA7r.jpg

404 ms

450x308_4PET.jpg

450x308_4PET.jpg

404 ms

5y35s11.jpg

5y35s11.jpg

404 ms

450x308_qhof.jpg

450x308_qhof.jpg

403 ms

450x308_hmzT.jpg

450x308_hmzT.jpg

485 ms

ycubqa450.jpg

ycubqa450.jpg

487 ms

450x308_8Htx.jpg

450x308_8Htx.jpg

488 ms

450x308_8e3H.jpg

450x308_8e3H.jpg

486 ms

450x308_FN3V.jpg

450x308_FN3V.jpg

485 ms

450x308_7qH5.jpg

450x308_7qH5.jpg

487 ms

450x308_17em.jpg

450x308_17em.jpg

552 ms

450x308_xdVX.jpg

450x308_xdVX.jpg

553 ms

450x308_5G71.jpg

450x308_5G71.jpg

553 ms

z1okr450-Recovered.jpg

z1okr450-Recovered.jpg

554 ms

x.png

x.png

554 ms

linkedin_cirr.png

linkedin_cirr.png

197 ms

pubads_impl.js

pubads_impl.js

152 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

448 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

191 ms

jizDREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTiUf2zI.ttf

jizDREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTiUf2zI.ttf

182 ms

jizAREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTi3s-CI0q14.ttf

jizAREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTi3s-CI0q14.ttf

200 ms

jizAREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTi20-SI0q14.ttf

jizAREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTi20-SI0q14.ttf

195 ms

css

css

132 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

168 ms

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtY.ttf

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtY.ttf

167 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

322 ms

collect

collect

127 ms

ads

ads

124 ms

container.html

container.html

116 ms

js

js

44 ms

450x308_9sg6.webp

450x308_9sg6.webp

100 ms

icon-up.png

icon-up.png

100 ms

298272945196813125

298272945196813125

202 ms

icon.png

icon.png

115 ms

abg_lite.js

abg_lite.js

223 ms

window_focus.js

window_focus.js

224 ms

ufs_web_display.js

ufs_web_display.js

115 ms

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

198 ms

ads

ads

128 ms

Accessibility Review

solar-energy.energytechreview.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

solar-energy.energytechreview.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

solar-energy.energytechreview.com SEO score

76

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Solar-energy.energytechreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Solar-energy.energytechreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

solar-energy.energytechreview.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Solar Energy Tech Review. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: