Tools & Wizards About Us
solar-technology-europe.energytechreview.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 76

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    35% of websites

solar-technology-europe.energytechreview.com

Energy Tech Review: Technology Magazine for Energy Industry

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

127 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

157 ms

solar-technology-europe.energytechreview.com screenshot

About Website

Visit solar-technology-europe.energytechreview.com now to see the best up-to-date Solar Technology Europe Energy Tech Review content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about solar-technology-europe.energytechreview.com

Energy Tech Review is a print and digital magazine that aggregates the brightest of minds, expert opinions, latest energy technologies news, analyses, and argument about the critical issues that exist...

Visit solar-technology-europe.energytechreview.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Solar-technology-europe.energytechreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 127 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

solar-technology-europe.energytechreview.com performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

45/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.8 s

49/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,310 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.242

51/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.2 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

solar-technology-europe.energytechreview.com

127 ms

solar-technology-europe.energytechreview.com

844 ms

bootstrap.css

318 ms

font-awesome.min.css

265 ms

animate.css

268 ms

Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 15% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Solar-technology-europe.energytechreview.com, 49% (40 requests) were made to Energytechreview.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (844 ms) belongs to the original domain Solar-technology-europe.energytechreview.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 446.4 kB (31%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

991.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Solar-technology-europe.energytechreview.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 49.6 kB

  • Original 66.4 kB
  • After minification 65.9 kB
  • After compression 16.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.6 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 269.6 kB
  • After minification 266.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Solar Technology Europe Energy Tech Review images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-36%

Potential reduce by 376.0 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB
  • After compression 666.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 376.0 kB or 36% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 17.2 kB

  • Original 59.6 kB
  • After minification 52.6 kB
  • After compression 42.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Solar-technology-europe.energytechreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 17.2 kB or 29% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (63%)

Requests Now

71

After Optimization

26

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Solar Technology Europe Energy Tech Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

solar-technology-europe.energytechreview.com

solar-technology-europe.energytechreview.com

127 ms

solar-technology-europe.energytechreview.com

solar-technology-europe.energytechreview.com

844 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

318 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

265 ms

animate.css

animate.css

268 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

273 ms

owl.theme.default.css

owl.theme.default.css

293 ms

normalize.css

normalize.css

296 ms

slicknav.min.css

slicknav.min.css

326 ms

style1.css

style1.css

119 ms

main.css

main.css

328 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

334 ms

modernizr-3.5.0.min.js

modernizr-3.5.0.min.js

358 ms

css

css

37 ms

css

css

49 ms

css

css

54 ms

js

js

110 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

101 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

119 ms

element.js

element.js

83 ms

new_region.css

new_region.css

482 ms

style.css

style.css

125 ms

jQuery.verticalCarousel.css

jQuery.verticalCarousel.css

145 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

37 ms

jQuery.verticalCarousel.js

jQuery.verticalCarousel.js

179 ms

jquery.flipbox.css

jquery.flipbox.css

180 ms

cube_slider.css

cube_slider.css

186 ms

jquery.flipbox.js

jquery.flipbox.js

186 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

534 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

427 ms

jquery.waypoints.min.js

jquery.waypoints.min.js

426 ms

jquery.slicknav.min.js

jquery.slicknav.min.js

427 ms

masonry.pkgd.min.js

masonry.pkgd.min.js

533 ms

main.js

main.js

534 ms

smart-sticky.js

smart-sticky.js

533 ms

theia-sticky-sidebar.js

theia-sticky-sidebar.js

533 ms

jquery_cookie.js

jquery_cookie.js

533 ms

custom.js

custom.js

573 ms

jquery.easy-ticker.js

jquery.easy-ticker.js

573 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

221 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

390 ms

atrk.js

atrk.js

210 ms

Final-Logo.png

Final-Logo.png

212 ms

load.gif

load.gif

255 ms

450x308_NOYu.jpg

450x308_NOYu.jpg

254 ms

450x308_qhof.jpg

450x308_qhof.jpg

254 ms

y94xaUntitled-5.webp

y94xaUntitled-5.webp

389 ms

8hi1icer.jpg

8hi1icer.jpg

498 ms

450x308_1h20.jpg

450x308_1h20.jpg

498 ms

450x308_9QN8.webp

450x308_9QN8.webp

410 ms

450x308_64RG.jpg

450x308_64RG.jpg

409 ms

jgcjpUntitled-22.jpg

jgcjpUntitled-22.jpg

410 ms

450x308_h0wL.jpg

450x308_h0wL.jpg

417 ms

450x308_96z1.jpg

450x308_96z1.jpg

489 ms

450x308_3zAZ.jpg

450x308_3zAZ.jpg

488 ms

x.png

x.png

488 ms

linkedin_cirr.png

linkedin_cirr.png

209 ms

pubads_impl.js

pubads_impl.js

194 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

333 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

286 ms

jizDREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTiUf2zE.woff

jizDREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTiUf2zE.woff

225 ms

jizAREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTi3s-CI0q10.woff

jizAREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTi3s-CI0q10.woff

234 ms

jizAREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTi20-SI0q10.woff

jizAREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTi20-SI0q10.woff

234 ms

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtU.woff

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtU.woff

199 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

288 ms

css

css

41 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

205 ms

collect

collect

163 ms

ads

ads

116 ms

container.html

container.html

50 ms

js

js

188 ms

y94xaUntitled-5.webp

y94xaUntitled-5.webp

102 ms

ads

ads

46 ms

12456792865918335218

12456792865918335218

163 ms

icon.png

icon.png

161 ms

abg_lite.js

abg_lite.js

202 ms

window_focus.js

window_focus.js

203 ms

ufs_web_display.js

ufs_web_display.js

39 ms

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

153 ms

450x308_9QN8.webp

450x308_9QN8.webp

81 ms

icon-up.png

icon-up.png

77 ms

Accessibility Review

solar-technology-europe.energytechreview.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

solar-technology-europe.energytechreview.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

solar-technology-europe.energytechreview.com SEO score

76

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Solar-technology-europe.energytechreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Solar-technology-europe.energytechreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

solar-technology-europe.energytechreview.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Solar Technology Europe Energy Tech Review. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: