Tools & Wizards About Us
trading.eoption.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 64

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    78% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 72% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 54

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    19% of websites

trading.eoption.com

Page Load Speed

456 ms in total

First Response

20 ms

Resources Loaded

333 ms

Page Rendered

103 ms

trading.eoption.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to trading.eoption.com homepage info - get ready to check Trading Eoption best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about trading.eoption.com

Visit trading.eoption.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Trading.eoption.com page load time and found that the first response time was 20 ms and then it took 436 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

trading.eoption.com performance score

64

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

45/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

24/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.1 s

93/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value330 ms

75/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.013

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.1 s

63/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

trading.eoption.com

20 ms

trading.eoption.com

42 ms

LogOn

50 ms

Site.css

14 ms

User.css

23 ms

Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Trading.eoption.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (140 ms) belongs to the original domain Trading.eoption.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 72.3 kB (63%)

Content Size

114.5 kB

After Optimization

42.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Trading.eoption.com main page is 114.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 63.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 37.4 kB

  • Original 50.8 kB
  • After minification 49.5 kB
  • After compression 13.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.4 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-55%

Potential reduce by 34.9 kB

  • Original 63.7 kB
  • After minification 28.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Trading Eoption needs image optimization as it can save up to 34.9 kB or 55% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (73%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Trading Eoption. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

trading.eoption.com

trading.eoption.com

20 ms

trading.eoption.com

trading.eoption.com

42 ms

LogOn

LogOn

50 ms

Site.css

Site.css

14 ms

User.css

User.css

23 ms

Controls.css

Controls.css

29 ms

etna-trader.theme.css

etna-trader.theme.css

25 ms

LogOnPageBundle.js

LogOnPageBundle.js

37 ms

knockout.js

knockout.js

29 ms

common.js

common.js

21 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

33 ms

jquery.autosize.min.js

jquery.autosize.min.js

29 ms

jquery.scrollableTextarea.js

jquery.scrollableTextarea.js

28 ms

utils.js

utils.js

29 ms

service.js

service.js

28 ms

ViewModelBuilder.js

ViewModelBuilder.js

30 ms

KnockoutExtension.js

KnockoutExtension.js

30 ms

JQueryExtension.js

JQueryExtension.js

31 ms

CustomBindings.js

CustomBindings.js

95 ms

ExecutionCounter.js

ExecutionCounter.js

93 ms

LoaderViewModel.js

LoaderViewModel.js

92 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

97 ms

site.css

site.css

99 ms

Toolbar.css

Toolbar.css

104 ms

LanguageViewModel.js

LanguageViewModel.js

107 ms

ContainerScroller.css

ContainerScroller.css

126 ms

jquery.mousewheel.js

jquery.mousewheel.js

127 ms

ContainerScroller.js

ContainerScroller.js

138 ms

FeedbackBundle.js

FeedbackBundle.js

140 ms

SegoeUIRegular.woff

SegoeUIRegular.woff

109 ms

SegoeUILight.woff

SegoeUILight.woff

109 ms

SegoeUISemiBold.woff

SegoeUISemiBold.woff

110 ms

SegoeUIBold.woff

SegoeUIBold.woff

110 ms

sprite.png

sprite.png

72 ms

feedback.png

feedback.png

58 ms

feedback-sprite.png

feedback-sprite.png

12 ms

Accessibility Review

trading.eoption.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

trading.eoption.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

trading.eoption.com SEO score

54

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Trading.eoption.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Trading.eoption.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

trading.eoption.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Trading Eoption. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: