5 sec in total
449 ms
3.8 sec
685 ms
Visit us.epg.com now to see the best up-to-date Us EPG content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about us.epg.com
Ehrhardt + Partner Group is a leading global provider of supply chain execution software for smarter logistics management.
Visit us.epg.comWe analyzed Us.epg.com page load time and found that the first response time was 449 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
us.epg.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
35/100
10%
Value5.3 s
22/100
25%
Value7.5 s
26/100
10%
Value210 ms
88/100
30%
Value0.293
41/100
15%
Value12.5 s
14/100
10%
449 ms
742 ms
124 ms
244 ms
346 ms
Our browser made a total of 108 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (95 requests) were addressed to the original Us.epg.com, 6% (6 requests) were made to Cdn.consentmanager.net and 3% (3 requests) were made to D.delivery.consentmanager.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Us.epg.com.
Page size can be reduced by 397.3 kB (5%)
8.8 MB
8.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Us.epg.com main page is 8.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 8.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 164.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 42.9 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 164.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 231.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Us EPG images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (50%)
96
48
The browser has sent 96 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Us EPG. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
us.epg.com
449 ms
us.epg.com
742 ms
font-awesome.min.1726824290.css
124 ms
slick.1726824290.css
244 ms
slick-theme.1726824290.css
346 ms
animate.1726824290.css
350 ms
main.1726824375.css
347 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.1726824290.css
348 ms
us.1726824389.css
352 ms
custom.1726824290.css
372 ms
navbartopbanner.1726824375.css
467 ms
gartnerbutton.1726824375.css
468 ms
colorcardsbutton.1726824375.css
470 ms
conversion.js
42 ms
jquery-2.2.4.min.1726824290.js
526 ms
jquery-ui.min.1726824290.js
527 ms
Form.min.1726555609.js
528 ms
bootstrap.min.1726824290.js
617 ms
bootstrap-toolkit.min.1726824290.js
616 ms
slick.min.1726824290.js
618 ms
lazysizes.min.1726824290.js
619 ms
ls.unveilhooks.min.1726824290.js
620 ms
visible.1726824290.js
620 ms
circle-progress.1726824290.js
715 ms
ScrollMagic.1726824290.js
718 ms
js.cookie.1726824290.js
718 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.1726824290.js
726 ms
scripts.1726824290.js
733 ms
main.1726824391.js
952 ms
cmp.php
588 ms
cmp_final.min.js
903 ms
csm_Flyout_800x800px_974cdb4057.png
480 ms
logo_US.svg
475 ms
gartner-logo.png
475 ms
color-cards-button.png
488 ms
csm_S1_Header_GPT_1920px_V01_1990445850.jpg
600 ms
csm_CONA-Case-Study-Truck_05330e5137.jpg
715 ms
csm_EUP-DE_Gartner-MQ_Header-Webseite_2160x1040px_2023-05_V2-0_opt_bd0ae686a5.png
1269 ms
csm_EPG_ColorCards_Banner-Landingpage_V2_2024-04-23_db1f8b845e.jpg
834 ms
csm_EPS.US_Header-Startseite_Vocollect_2023_cef974e513.png
1216 ms
csm_pick-by-voice__2__5cdc00b05a.jpg
836 ms
csm_pick-by-voice__8__020a6d54b9.jpg
728 ms
csm_EBL_HRL_Shuttle_02_1920px_d589a7a952.jpg
951 ms
csm_Banner2_optimized_87ae059baa.jpg
961 ms
csm_pick-by-voice__4__3e05a93639.jpg
963 ms
csm_Pet-Food-Experts-warehouse-management-software-lydia-voice-reference_135426c5b5.jpg
963 ms
csm_Simba-Dickie-replaced-Vocollect-Voice-with-Lydia-Voice_87424d280f.jpg
1073 ms
csm_Hellmann-old-livery-2_095b94a1bf.jpg
1082 ms
csm_CONA-Case-Study-Truck_bfe8d2c6a7.jpg
1083 ms
csm_Vestas-case-study-warehouse-management-system-3PL-9_332c2d7c7d.jpeg
1085 ms
csm_Ferguson-case-study-lydia-voice-for-voice-picking_quote6_9d38bb4f9d.jpg
1216 ms
csm_South-Shore-Furniture-case-study-lydia-voice-for-voice-picking_quote3_5db04aeeb6.jpg
1175 ms
csm_Caterpillar-case-study-voice-solution-warehouse_9c1e04e786.jpg
1171 ms
globalsite_gartner_logo_02.png
1172 ms
modern-materials-handling-vector-logo.png
1142 ms
DCVelocity-Log.png
1176 ms
Inbound-Logistics-1.png
1190 ms
logo-logistics-management-logo-002.png
1189 ms
supplychaindive_02.png
1186 ms
SupplyChainLogo-176px.jpg
1247 ms
60 ms
92679273-9798-4d27-893b-d53dfd2bb4c7.woff
1241 ms
263 ms
a5b8bb93-9622-41a0-b35f-a44a14f0c095.woff
1202 ms
7fd00069-f615-471e-8089-b0bab013cfd9.woff
1220 ms
icomoon.ttf
1217 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
1023 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1057 ms
803af1a9-a09b-4de5-ba36-e3d228fb5bc4.woff
1076 ms
92c69f6c-0185-4eb2-800e-1ee3947ca4dd.woff
1096 ms
0248a27d-0abf-4b74-a3c5-47a73e09098d.woff
1098 ms
slick.woff
1094 ms
SAP-Insider.jpg
1088 ms
cmp.php
427 ms
Gartner-Peer-Insights-Customer-First-Batch.png
1034 ms
icon-list-checkmark.svg
929 ms
US.png
953 ms
MX.png
861 ms
DE.png
860 ms
CZ.png
742 ms
NL.png
791 ms
PT.png
801 ms
ES.png
838 ms
bV8xLndfOTEwNDMucl9HRFBSLmxfZW4uZF8zNzE3MS54XzYxLnYucC50XzM3MTcxLnh0XzEz.js
123 ms
FR.png
747 ms
GB.png
733 ms
PL.png
732 ms
IT.png
791 ms
recall_shield.svg
103 ms
105 ms
logo1709620342x4110.gif
146 ms
cmplogo.svg
251 ms
en.svg
296 ms
183 ms
AE.png
668 ms
JP.png
706 ms
AU.png
719 ms
ep_wms.warehouse.icon.KO_37.png
718 ms
ep_wcs.machinepicking.icon.KO_18.png
685 ms
ep_lms.helmetgear.icon.KO_07.png
728 ms
ep_Voice.headset.icon.KO_47.png
727 ms
whitepaper_48.svg
730 ms
video_46.svg
731 ms
studien_46.svg
732 ms
casestudies_54.svg
739 ms
icon-international_63.svg
730 ms
icon-nav-arrow.svg
705 ms
ajax-loader.gif
704 ms
us.epg.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
us.epg.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
us.epg.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Us.epg.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Us.epg.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
us.epg.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Us EPG. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: