Report Summary

  • 78

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

1001.filemail.com

Send Large Files Free - Fast Secure File Transfer - Filemail

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

273 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

884 ms

1001.filemail.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to 1001.filemail.com homepage info - get ready to check 1001 Filemail best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about 1001.filemail.com

Send large files free via email and links. Paid accounts share files of any size. Fast secure online file transfer using our file sharing site & apps.

Visit 1001.filemail.com

Key Findings

We analyzed 1001.filemail.com page load time and found that the first response time was 273 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

1001.filemail.com performance score

78

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

52/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

80/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.6 s

87/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value310 ms

78/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.039

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.3 s

61/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

1001.filemail.com

273 ms

www.filemail.com

618 ms

container_UpE19V8Y.js

655 ms

fontspreload.css

144 ms

30ad3d949c4d89c7cd03e17aa417f17ea7cf4cff0841010d77112089d340

396 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original 1001.filemail.com, 86% (36 requests) were made to Filemail.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Analytics.filemail.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (906 ms) relates to the external source Filemail.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 295.4 kB (12%)

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

In fact, the total size of 1001.filemail.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 234.3 kB

  • Original 310.0 kB
  • After minification 290.0 kB
  • After compression 75.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 234.3 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 60.5 kB

  • Original 2.1 MB
  • After minification 2.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 1001 Filemail images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 221 B

  • Original 34.6 kB
  • After minification 34.6 kB
  • After compression 34.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-36%

Potential reduce by 369 B

  • Original 1.0 kB
  • After minification 1.0 kB
  • After compression 653 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 1001.filemail.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 369 B or 36% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

37

After Optimization

37

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 1001 Filemail. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

1001.filemail.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

1001.filemail.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

1001.filemail.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 1001.filemail.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 1001.filemail.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of 1001 Filemail. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: