Tools & Wizards About Us
baking-technology.fbtechreview.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

baking-technology.fbtechreview.com

Latest Trends in Baking Technology | Food & Beverage Tech Review

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

131 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

154 ms

baking-technology.fbtechreview.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to baking-technology.fbtechreview.com homepage info - get ready to check Baking Technology Fb Tech Review best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about baking-technology.fbtechreview.com

Food & Beverage Tech Review magazine provides Latest Trends in baking technology and food technology, news, articles, listing of top baking technology Companies by improving the overall efficiency and...

Visit baking-technology.fbtechreview.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Baking-technology.fbtechreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 131 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

baking-technology.fbtechreview.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

25/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.4 s

40/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,150 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.034

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.1 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

baking-technology.fbtechreview.com

131 ms

baking-technology.fbtechreview.com

440 ms

jQuery.verticalCarousel.css

131 ms

style.css

200 ms

style1.css

200 ms

Our browser made a total of 109 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 48% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Baking-technology.fbtechreview.com, 14% (15 requests) were made to Fbtechreview.com and 7% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (870 ms) belongs to the original domain Baking-technology.fbtechreview.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 406.4 kB (26%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Baking-technology.fbtechreview.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 773.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 73.7 kB

  • Original 95.8 kB
  • After minification 92.8 kB
  • After compression 22.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 73.7 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 384.4 kB
  • After minification 382.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Baking Technology Fb Tech Review images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 117.7 kB

  • Original 773.4 kB
  • After minification 752.0 kB
  • After compression 655.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 117.7 kB or 15% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 213.5 kB

  • Original 310.9 kB
  • After minification 288.7 kB
  • After compression 97.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Baking-technology.fbtechreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 213.5 kB or 69% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 69 (74%)

Requests Now

93

After Optimization

24

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 93 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Baking Technology Fb Tech Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 42 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 29 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

baking-technology.fbtechreview.com

baking-technology.fbtechreview.com

131 ms

baking-technology.fbtechreview.com

baking-technology.fbtechreview.com

440 ms

jQuery.verticalCarousel.css

jQuery.verticalCarousel.css

131 ms

style.css

style.css

200 ms

style1.css

style1.css

200 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

265 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

216 ms

animate.css

animate.css

225 ms

hover-min.css

hover-min.css

219 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

262 ms

meanmenu.min.css

meanmenu.min.css

259 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

276 ms

lightbox.min.css

lightbox.min.css

292 ms

style.css

style.css

356 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

320 ms

style.css

style.css

328 ms

social_sharing.css

social_sharing.css

326 ms

site.css

site.css

339 ms

css

css

72 ms

modernizr-2.8.3.min.js

modernizr-2.8.3.min.js

362 ms

js

js

112 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

195 ms

js

js

151 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

156 ms

new_region.css

new_region.css

578 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

72 ms

element.js

element.js

105 ms

menu.css

menu.css

581 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

318 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

77 ms

main4906_v1.css

main4906_v1.css

581 ms

skins4906.css

skins4906.css

582 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

32 ms

search.js

search.js

533 ms

jolly-menu.js

jolly-menu.js

533 ms

cio.js

cio.js

601 ms

css

css

32 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

28 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

35 ms

jquery.flipbox.css

jquery.flipbox.css

600 ms

cube_slider.css

cube_slider.css

600 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

600 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

600 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

599 ms

jquery.meanmenu.js

jquery.meanmenu.js

760 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

759 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

765 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.js

jquery.magnific-popup.js

764 ms

jquery.counterup.min.js

jquery.counterup.min.js

758 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

759 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

26 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

309 ms

jquery.waypoints.min.js

jquery.waypoints.min.js

522 ms

jquery.slicknav.min.js

jquery.slicknav.min.js

524 ms

masonry.pkgd.min.js

masonry.pkgd.min.js

525 ms

main.js

main.js

525 ms

smart-sticky.js

smart-sticky.js

526 ms

theia-sticky-sidebar.js

theia-sticky-sidebar.js

528 ms

jquery_cookie.js

jquery_cookie.js

271 ms

custom.js

custom.js

276 ms

lightbox.min.js

lightbox.min.js

870 ms

main.js

main.js

808 ms

jquery_cookie.js

jquery_cookie.js

740 ms

custom.js

custom.js

735 ms

jquery.easy-ticker.js

jquery.easy-ticker.js

724 ms

css

css

18 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

408 ms

atrk.js

atrk.js

239 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

242 ms

close.png

close.png

519 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

597 ms

prev.png

prev.png

598 ms

next.png

next.png

598 ms

logo.png

logo.png

746 ms

toggleIcon.png

toggleIcon.png

598 ms

linkedin_cirr.png

linkedin_cirr.png

627 ms

370x420_fmTR.webp

370x420_fmTR.webp

238 ms

370x420_dbvq.jpg

370x420_dbvq.jpg

391 ms

370x420_25f8.jpg

370x420_25f8.jpg

505 ms

450x308_bT46.jpg

450x308_bT46.jpg

397 ms

450x308_Xt03.gif

450x308_Xt03.gif

616 ms

bkj1cRanking.jpg

bkj1cRanking.jpg

616 ms

zmc3c400.jpg

zmc3c400.jpg

506 ms

zv1kbUntitled-1rfgtf.jpg

zv1kbUntitled-1rfgtf.jpg

616 ms

x.png

x.png

508 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

521 ms

zrt_lookup_nohtml.html

zrt_lookup_nohtml.html

297 ms

pubads_impl.js

pubads_impl.js

81 ms

js

js

196 ms

js

js

257 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

253 ms

css

css

170 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

107 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

106 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

213 ms

fontawesome-webfont3e6e.woff

fontawesome-webfont3e6e.woff

224 ms

fontawesome-webfont3e6e.woff

fontawesome-webfont3e6e.woff

330 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

224 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

227 ms

collect

collect

141 ms

370x420_fmTR.webp

370x420_fmTR.webp

151 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

126 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

123 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

124 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

157 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

55 ms

ads

ads

111 ms

collect

collect

139 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.ttf

glyphicons-halflings-regular.ttf

63 ms

Accessibility Review

baking-technology.fbtechreview.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

baking-technology.fbtechreview.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

baking-technology.fbtechreview.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Baking-technology.fbtechreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Baking-technology.fbtechreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

baking-technology.fbtechreview.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Baking Technology Fb Tech Review. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: