5.2 sec in total
404 ms
4 sec
799 ms
Welcome to better.future-processing.com homepage info - get ready to check Better Future Processing best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about better.future-processing.com
The market nowadays is filled with solutions aimed at not only optimising our actions, but also adding a completely new dimension to them. We believe that thanks to new technologies a better future is...
Visit better.future-processing.comWe analyzed Better.future-processing.com page load time and found that the first response time was 404 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
better.future-processing.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.9 s
4/100
10%
Value9.1 s
1/100
25%
Value7.0 s
33/100
10%
Value610 ms
49/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value8.0 s
42/100
10%
404 ms
463 ms
64 ms
253 ms
275 ms
Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Better.future-processing.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source Google.com.
Page size can be reduced by 356.0 kB (42%)
841.8 kB
485.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Better.future-processing.com main page is 841.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 659.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 107.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 107.4 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 246.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Better Future Processing needs image optimization as it can save up to 246.3 kB or 37% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 50 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Better.future-processing.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.2 kB or 18% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (22%)
37
29
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Better Future Processing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
better.future-processing.com
404 ms
better.future-processing.com
463 ms
gtm.js
64 ms
app.cac1bcb764b7635c1f14089931ba3ea0.css
253 ms
manifest.17490b280f1afd2d1291.js
275 ms
vendor.e4c407697cf83bac8352.js
821 ms
app.f5c7077f1976f03b5886.js
654 ms
hotjar-600058.js
181 ms
analytics.js
78 ms
css
101 ms
collect
21 ms
modules.61e17720cf639c3e96a7.js
36 ms
collect
128 ms
ga-audiences
1637 ms
player_api
123 ms
rows
291 ms
rows
340 ms
rows
350 ms
rows
317 ms
rows
1185 ms
rows
1022 ms
rows
993 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
64 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
64 ms
www-widgetapi.js
13 ms
box-69edcc3187336f9b0a3fbb4c73be9fe6.html
45 ms
visit-data
1066 ms
e1385ccf8d8988521d6592478fa07b10.png
1168 ms
bg-chain.492f382.jpg
421 ms
malleable-fp-thin.82a7e2b.woff
289 ms
malleable-fp-light.de8cab5.woff
289 ms
malleable-fp-regular.1783b51.woff
292 ms
59f8846f08da2b4a7e38acb94da1f5bb.jpg
289 ms
7a1bb38f903ca756c11daded106d6d55.jpg
411 ms
9a4986643da1a2991ea89ff213b7efd6.jpg
412 ms
f82430ccd31d9150385b3437c73fd04b.jpg
413 ms
5a7c3506cd603a24a71f484b1f9410e7.png
432 ms
53641915a71b5df54af87f8ba1ece5a7.png
476 ms
5aa20660544fc7f10f548b0f77287084.JPG
510 ms
b000d61cffefb67fb348a0abfa3212cc.jpg
552 ms
a9e04d532537b5bc153ca0940eea8496.jpg
299 ms
b3843af0110610a39ac9b77b69eb41e9.jpg
363 ms
4b4e7a67e9cc99d68ed3216b07faba67.jpg
385 ms
88c1d4416b933e74d960a9783aa9697a.png
546 ms
better.future-processing.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
better.future-processing.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
better.future-processing.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Better.future-processing.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Better.future-processing.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
better.future-processing.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Better Future Processing. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: