3.7 sec in total
294 ms
3.1 sec
378 ms
Visit blog.frareg.com now to see the best up-to-date Blog Frareg content for Italy and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about blog.frareg.com
Frareg è una società di Consulenza e Formazione in Sicurezza sul Lavoro, Qualità, Ambiente e Privacy, Medicina del Lavoro a Milano, Roma, Bologna e Padova
Visit blog.frareg.comWe analyzed Blog.frareg.com page load time and found that the first response time was 294 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
blog.frareg.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
24/100
10%
Value9.7 s
0/100
25%
Value8.4 s
19/100
10%
Value1,570 ms
13/100
30%
Value0.284
42/100
15%
Value10.8 s
22/100
10%
294 ms
1145 ms
177 ms
50 ms
420 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Blog.frareg.com, 79% (59 requests) were made to Frareg.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Frareg.com.
Page size can be reduced by 202.8 kB (25%)
798.1 kB
595.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Blog.frareg.com main page is 798.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 374.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 198.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 198.7 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 749 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Blog Frareg images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 3.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 360 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Blog.frareg.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (80%)
66
13
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Blog Frareg. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 54 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
blog.frareg.com
294 ms
www.frareg.com
1145 ms
177 ms
kj23p13s07
50 ms
autoptimize_4549d5fbd82a10be222e9571b780d843.css
420 ms
autoptimize_single_8610f03fe77640dee8c4cc924e060f12.js
401 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
243 ms
autoptimize_single_3d42378eb3b98e79d1fe6161bfd9375b.js
243 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
248 ms
lightbox.min.js
247 ms
fb.min.js
324 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
328 ms
autoptimize_single_902b7ca09549975e55e136fb0026df9a.js
329 ms
modernizr.min.js
331 ms
jquery.mobile.custom-1.4.5.min.js
405 ms
autoptimize_single_6d3734401281eb0f775373b9430b53c5.js
409 ms
js
65 ms
api.js
38 ms
lazysizes.min.js
410 ms
core.min.js
413 ms
datepicker.min.js
587 ms
autoptimize_single_9010f5f55d914a89449b9fe377e452b3.js
601 ms
autoptimize_single_cd436734e12040b99bc2cb3f653d09f7.js
602 ms
jquery.tabs.min.js
602 ms
autoptimize_single_aab73d9d1d9d2c250bc5e800b986647a.js
602 ms
autoptimize_single_1ba5692a9fe6c99d02edd2688c0e09fc.js
601 ms
autoptimize_single_edb3b00fc071c683f164b19af9351df9.js
600 ms
autoptimize_single_b80d2f64c840bbe0366e0c577569fa50.js
699 ms
autoptimize_single_56840ec2b84a0ff73d58e8e929e09ef1.js
698 ms
autoptimize_single_754fcebbf1082f189f19b68192e02fe1.js
697 ms
autoptimize_single_e6898c80d27428af3ce13231366c1b0e.js
698 ms
autoptimize_single_3452dc2992b909bfdbdb72fe3d85ee53.js
699 ms
autoptimize_single_cf8fca3c5357b39539e26c69093e3b5a.js
699 ms
autoptimize_single_77572c899b299f36f5775361d8fe631a.js
764 ms
autoptimize_single_a0ac5f6eec5ac5c46180d3d7611794cd.js
786 ms
autoptimize_single_97af1726a86133c5ed9dc96a25c44881.js
763 ms
autoptimize_single_e92ff0fc963adf81b5ba863c473523de.js
785 ms
js.cookie.min.js
763 ms
woocommerce.min.js
786 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
895 ms
jquery.ui.totop.min.js
858 ms
autoptimize_single_f70b9f6b0e992eb893ffd0bbb92816a0.js
858 ms
clarity.js
15 ms
autoptimize_single_7115e6a775cbac5535de07c965094770.js
625 ms
autoptimize_single_8aed087fd7fab44724dbe03aa40d17dd.js
659 ms
autoptimize_single_3193f03c61de6f1765ad751c26603b24.js
656 ms
autoptimize_single_5ebec3e05eadc16ffeb95eea740a66ca.js
690 ms
autoptimize_single_5a852947fefc19012c8f7d0e57377b1c.js
615 ms
autoptimize_single_5dd535dbf6b38af48266b59db701293c.js
611 ms
autoptimize_single_ec8b8ad9689eb9ff11382064c73e9645.js
623 ms
cookielaw.min.js
621 ms
autoptimize_single_11feadfc84b9cabd6cfc5d7a542dc059.js
635 ms
wp-embed.min.js
606 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
606 ms
sdk.js
134 ms
webfont.js
158 ms
close.png
496 ms
loading.gif
513 ms
prev.png
447 ms
next.png
717 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
738 ms
serioussliderglyphs.ttf
705 ms
search-ico2.png
706 ms
sdk.js
46 ms
recaptcha__en.js
91 ms
css
86 ms
122 ms
logo.png
546 ms
backgroundFrareg.jpg
547 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
21 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
43 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
79 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexQ.ttf
80 ms
ui.totop.png
84 ms
c.gif
7 ms
blog.frareg.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
blog.frareg.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
blog.frareg.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
IT
IT
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Blog.frareg.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Italian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Blog.frareg.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
blog.frareg.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Blog Frareg. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: