Tools & Wizards About Us
de.flightsim.to screenshot

Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 81

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

de.flightsim.to

Microsoft Flight Simulator | MSFS Mods, Add-Ons & Liveries - Flightsim.to

Page Load Speed

7.7 sec in total

First Response

1.3 sec

Resources Loaded

4 sec

Page Rendered

2.3 sec

de.flightsim.to screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing De Flightsim content for China. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about de.flightsim.to

✓ Entdecke Freeware Microsoft Flight Simulator Mods und Add-Ons - Entdecke eine große Auswahl an neuen Flugzeugen, Liveries, Flughäfen, Tweaks und mehr für MSFS2020 kostenlos.

Visit de.flightsim.to

Key Findings

We analyzed De.flightsim.to page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 6.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

de.flightsim.to performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value25.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.4 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value6,760 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value37.7 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

de.flightsim.to

1319 ms

style.css

87 ms

font-awesome.css

82 ms

night.css

42 ms

custom.css

93 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original De.flightsim.to, 71% (41 requests) were made to Assets.flightsim.to and 9% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain De.flightsim.to.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 568.1 kB (42%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

777.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of De.flightsim.to main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 644.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 552.2 kB

  • Original 644.5 kB
  • After minification 644.5 kB
  • After compression 92.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 552.2 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 624 B

  • Original 34.0 kB
  • After minification 33.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. De Flightsim images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

  • Original 330.8 kB
  • After minification 330.8 kB
  • After compression 328.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 13.2 kB

  • Original 335.7 kB
  • After minification 335.7 kB
  • After compression 322.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. De.flightsim.to has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (83%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

8

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of De Flightsim. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

de.flightsim.to

de.flightsim.to

1319 ms

style.css

style.css

87 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

82 ms

night.css

night.css

42 ms

custom.css

custom.css

93 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

86 ms

light.css

light.css

45 ms

leo.css

leo.css

47 ms

tailwind.min.css

tailwind.min.css

96 ms

jquery-1.7.2.min.js

jquery-1.7.2.min.js

48 ms

night.js

night.js

50 ms

api.js

api.js

51 ms

choice.js

choice.js

439 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

26 ms

cmp2-polyfilled.js

cmp2-polyfilled.js

4 ms

cls.css

cls.css

33 ms

pubfig.min.js

pubfig.min.js

72 ms

js

js

168 ms

flag-icon.min.css

flag-icon.min.css

166 ms

css2

css2

172 ms

page.js

page.js

166 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

21 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

165 ms

main.js

main.js

165 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

22 ms

leo.js

leo.js

165 ms

chosen.jquery.min.js

chosen.jquery.min.js

164 ms

chosen.min.css

chosen.min.css

169 ms

tailwind-components.min.css

tailwind-components.min.css

174 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

173 ms

sweet-alert.min.js

sweet-alert.min.js

165 ms

v84a3a4012de94ce1a686ba8c167c359c1696973893317

v84a3a4012de94ce1a686ba8c167c359c1696973893317

172 ms

PlusJakartaSans-Medium.woff

PlusJakartaSans-Medium.woff

150 ms

PlusJakartaSans-Regular.woff

PlusJakartaSans-Regular.woff

149 ms

PlusJakartaSans-Light.woff

PlusJakartaSans-Light.woff

151 ms

PlusJakartaSans-SemiBold.woff

PlusJakartaSans-SemiBold.woff

414 ms

PlusJakartaSans-Bold.woff

PlusJakartaSans-Bold.woff

152 ms

PlusJakartaSans-ExtraBold.woff

PlusJakartaSans-ExtraBold.woff

152 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

153 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

153 ms

us.svg

us.svg

202 ms

fr.svg

fr.svg

83 ms

jp.svg

jp.svg

96 ms

ua.svg

ua.svg

95 ms

cn.svg

cn.svg

84 ms

nz.svg

nz.svg

89 ms

ca.svg

ca.svg

85 ms

pl.svg

pl.svg

87 ms

co.svg

co.svg

87 ms

gb.svg

gb.svg

95 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

92 ms

fallback

fallback

45 ms

fallback__ltr.css

fallback__ltr.css

4 ms

payload

payload

22 ms

css

css

12 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

4 ms

refresh_black.png

refresh_black.png

5 ms

audio_black.png

audio_black.png

9 ms

Accessibility Review

de.flightsim.to accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

de.flightsim.to best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

de.flightsim.to SEO score

81

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise De.flightsim.to can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed German language. Our system also found out that De.flightsim.to main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

de.flightsim.to

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of De Flightsim. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: