4.6 sec in total
567 ms
3.5 sec
447 ms
Click here to check amazing F1 Support content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about f1support.co.uk
We’re a local IT Support company based in Surrey that can help you with installing, operating, upgrading and overall security of your IT systems. Call us today!
Visit f1support.co.ukWe analyzed F1support.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 567 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
f1support.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.5 s
15/100
10%
Value12.7 s
0/100
25%
Value10.6 s
7/100
10%
Value2,160 ms
6/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value15.5 s
7/100
10%
567 ms
286 ms
38 ms
372 ms
121 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original F1support.co.uk, 4% (3 requests) were made to Code.jquery.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Js.hs-scripts.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (905 ms) belongs to the original domain F1support.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 124.4 kB (14%)
891.1 kB
766.6 kB
In fact, the total size of F1support.co.uk main page is 891.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 487.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 90.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 90.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. F1 Support images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 25.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 5.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. F1support.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (68%)
72
23
The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of F1 Support. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 50 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.f1support.co.uk
567 ms
abryf.css
286 ms
css
38 ms
abryf.js
372 ms
7361887.js
121 ms
jquery-2.0.3.min.js
46 ms
jquery-1.10.2.js
45 ms
comment-reply.min.js
189 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
433 ms
index.js
356 ms
7361887.js
177 ms
froogaloop2.min.js
45 ms
main-plugins.js
466 ms
theme-plugins.js
489 ms
be-slider.js
356 ms
plugin-scrollToSections.js
465 ms
plugin-canvas.js
464 ms
plugin-NProgress.js
465 ms
plugin-magnificpopup.js
477 ms
plugin-backgroundcheck.js
587 ms
core.min.js
591 ms
accordion.min.js
589 ms
tabs.min.js
587 ms
effect.min.js
588 ms
script.js
596 ms
masterslider.min.js
664 ms
be-modules-plugin.js
750 ms
plugin-textRotator.js
658 ms
plugin-easyPieChart.js
664 ms
plugin-hoverdir.js
663 ms
plugin-typed.js
706 ms
plugin-countTo.js
750 ms
jquery.countdown.min.js
764 ms
jquery.justifiedGallery.min.js
761 ms
be-modules-script.js
765 ms
be-portfolio-layout.js
789 ms
js
69 ms
wp-embed.min.js
849 ms
dwf.js
848 ms
jquery-ui.js
52 ms
swap.js
45 ms
logo.png
539 ms
ESET-logo-Lozenge-Flat-Colour-Mid-Grey-tag-RGB.png
542 ms
vuzion.png
541 ms
NSN-logo-1.png
577 ms
microsoftt-partner-1.png
621 ms
draytek_authorised_dealer_small.png
623 ms
teamviewer2-640x360.png
634 ms
conversations-embed.js
154 ms
7361887.js
273 ms
leadflows.js
171 ms
7361887.js
314 ms
collectedforms.js
262 ms
alpha-ssl-logo21-1.png
605 ms
DellPartnerDirect.png
608 ms
solarwise.png
563 ms
font
88 ms
icomoon.woff
905 ms
font
88 ms
analytics.js
85 ms
wp-polyfill-fetch.min.js
579 ms
wp-polyfill-dom-rect.min.js
595 ms
wp-polyfill-url.min.js
595 ms
wp-polyfill-formdata.min.js
635 ms
wp-polyfill-element-closest.min.js
626 ms
wp-polyfill-object-fit.min.js
654 ms
collect
19 ms
Epson-logo-2A4B23D462-seeklogo.com_.png
743 ms
nsn-affinity.png
741 ms
DrayTek-Certified_3.png
740 ms
logo.png
743 ms
nav-banner.png
739 ms
f1s-bubbles-narrow.jpg
738 ms
js
77 ms
grey-bg.jpg
675 ms
f1support.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
f1support.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
f1support.co.uk SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise F1support.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that F1support.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
f1support.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of F1 Support. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: