Tools & Wizards About Us
f4f.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 53

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 22% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

f4f.in

F4F.in Domain Name Is Available to Buy - Domain Name Marketplace

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

267 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

172 ms

f4f.in screenshot

About Website

Welcome to f4f.in homepage info - get ready to check F4F best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about f4f.in

DaaZ, largest domain marketplace simple, easy & secure platform to buy domain names. Buy this F4F.in Domain at best price at DaaZ.

Visit f4f.in

Key Findings

We analyzed F4f.in page load time and found that the first response time was 267 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

f4f.in performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

f4f.in

267 ms

f4f.in

346 ms

F4F.in

442 ms

googlefonts.css

130 ms

tp.widget.bootstrap.min.js

187 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original F4f.in, 63% (25 requests) were made to Daaz.com and 30% (12 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (660 ms) relates to the external source Daaz.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 57.7 kB (33%)

Content Size

175.4 kB

After Optimization

117.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of F4f.in main page is 175.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 82.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 24.8 kB

  • Original 33.8 kB
  • After minification 33.7 kB
  • After compression 9.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.8 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-38%

Potential reduce by 31.5 kB

  • Original 82.5 kB
  • After minification 51.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, F4F needs image optimization as it can save up to 31.5 kB or 38% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 54.0 kB
  • After minification 54.0 kB
  • After compression 52.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 366 B

  • Original 5.2 kB
  • After minification 5.2 kB
  • After compression 4.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. F4f.in has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (50%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

18

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of F4F. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

f4f.in

f4f.in

267 ms

f4f.in

f4f.in

346 ms

F4F.in

F4F.in

442 ms

googlefonts.css

googlefonts.css

130 ms

tp.widget.bootstrap.min.js

tp.widget.bootstrap.min.js

187 ms

icon.css

icon.css

184 ms

style4.css

style4.css

188 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

360 ms

fittext.js

fittext.js

149 ms

platform.js

platform.js

446 ms

js

js

58 ms

js

js

78 ms

logo.png

logo.png

447 ms

trust-stamp.png

trust-stamp.png

450 ms

payment.png

payment.png

450 ms

money-back1.png

money-back1.png

452 ms

transfer1.png

transfer1.png

453 ms

secure-payment1.png

secure-payment1.png

454 ms

money-back-w.png

money-back-w.png

567 ms

money-back-img1.png

money-back-img1.png

570 ms

money-back-img2.png

money-back-img2.png

571 ms

money-back-img3.png

money-back-img3.png

569 ms

transper-img1.png

transper-img1.png

659 ms

transper-img2.png

transper-img2.png

660 ms

secure-payment-img1.png

secure-payment-img1.png

659 ms

secure-payment-img2.png

secure-payment-img2.png

658 ms

default

default

245 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

240 ms

fontello.woff

fontello.woff

345 ms

twk-arr-find-polyfill.js

twk-arr-find-polyfill.js

38 ms

twk-object-values-polyfill.js

twk-object-values-polyfill.js

56 ms

twk-event-polyfill.js

twk-event-polyfill.js

57 ms

twk-entries-polyfill.js

twk-entries-polyfill.js

36 ms

twk-promise-polyfill.js

twk-promise-polyfill.js

57 ms

twk-main.js

twk-main.js

48 ms

twk-vendor.js

twk-vendor.js

77 ms

twk-chunk-vendors.js

twk-chunk-vendors.js

57 ms

twk-chunk-common.js

twk-chunk-common.js

74 ms

twk-runtime.js

twk-runtime.js

76 ms

twk-app.js

twk-app.js

56 ms

Accessibility Review

f4f.in accessibility score

53

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

f4f.in best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

f4f.in SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise F4f.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that F4f.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

f4f.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of F4F. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: