Tools & Wizards About Us
fabricinspection.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 58

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

fabricinspection.com

Fabric Inspection System, Fabric Inspection Machine, Textile Machinery, Mumbai, India

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

167 ms

Resources Loaded

991 ms

Page Rendered

303 ms

fabricinspection.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to fabricinspection.com homepage info - get ready to check Fabric Inspection best content right away, or after learning these important things about fabricinspection.com

We are Manufacturers, Suppliers And Exporters Of Fabric Inspection System, Fabric Inspection Machine, Textile Machinery, Automatic Fabric Roll Packing Machine, Fabric Double Fold Lapping Machine, Mumb...

Visit fabricinspection.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Fabricinspection.com page load time and found that the first response time was 167 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

fabricinspection.com performance score

58

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

46/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

19/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.1 s

93/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value100 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.562

12/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.9 s

78/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

fabricinspection.com

167 ms

fabricinspection.com

152 ms

bootstrap.css

64 ms

style.css

91 ms

font-awesome.css

92 ms

Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Fabricinspection.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (394 ms) belongs to the original domain Fabricinspection.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 87.3 kB (3%)

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

2.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Fabricinspection.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 14.7 kB

  • Original 19.2 kB
  • After minification 17.0 kB
  • After compression 4.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.2 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.7 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 34.0 kB

  • Original 2.4 MB
  • After minification 2.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fabric Inspection images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 8.1 kB

  • Original 108.1 kB
  • After minification 108.1 kB
  • After compression 100.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-51%

Potential reduce by 30.5 kB

  • Original 59.8 kB
  • After minification 53.7 kB
  • After compression 29.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fabricinspection.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 30.5 kB or 51% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (16%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

47

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fabric Inspection. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

fabricinspection.com

fabricinspection.com

167 ms

fabricinspection.com

fabricinspection.com

152 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

64 ms

style.css

style.css

91 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

92 ms

index.css

index.css

92 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

19 ms

jquery-1.11.3.min.js

jquery-1.11.3.min.js

133 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

130 ms

jquery.filterizr.js

jquery.filterizr.js

103 ms

controls.js

controls.js

126 ms

element.js

element.js

50 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

79 ms

gayatritex-logo.png

gayatritex-logo.png

91 ms

fabric-engineering.jpg

fabric-engineering.jpg

110 ms

fabric-textile-accessories.jpg

fabric-textile-accessories.jpg

149 ms

fabric-mending-machines.jpg

fabric-mending-machines.jpg

132 ms

packing-machine.jpg

packing-machine.jpg

102 ms

company.jpg

company.jpg

64 ms

checkmaster-b.png

checkmaster-b.png

188 ms

check-master-finish.png

check-master-finish.png

189 ms

checkmaster-i.png

checkmaster-i.png

193 ms

check-master-b-pile.png

check-master-b-pile.png

202 ms

check-master-i-pile.png

check-master-i-pile.png

235 ms

master-mend-roll.png

master-mend-roll.png

248 ms

check-master-basic.png

check-master-basic.png

302 ms

check-master-knitt.png

check-master-knitt.png

288 ms

check-master-tubeknit.png

check-master-tubeknit.png

279 ms

supply.jpg

supply.jpg

257 ms

abyat.png

abyat.png

280 ms

aditya-birla.png

aditya-birla.png

291 ms

alps.png

alps.png

293 ms

ashvira.png

ashvira.png

314 ms

bks-textiles.png

bks-textiles.png

312 ms

brfl.png

brfl.png

319 ms

cil.png

cil.png

321 ms

damodar.png

damodar.png

323 ms

dicitex.png

dicitex.png

334 ms

donear.png

donear.png

345 ms

ganges-jute.png

ganges-jute.png

349 ms

garware.png

garware.png

352 ms

gm-fabrics.png

gm-fabrics.png

354 ms

hindoostan.png

hindoostan.png

355 ms

linen-fiesta.png

linen-fiesta.png

366 ms

napoleon.png

napoleon.png

378 ms

nilkamal.png

nilkamal.png

379 ms

nirav.png

nirav.png

383 ms

nsl-textiles.png

nsl-textiles.png

384 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

394 ms

collect

collect

13 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

342 ms

RaleighLTStd.otf

RaleighLTStd.otf

324 ms

ramvijay.png

ramvijay.png

314 ms

raymond.png

raymond.png

312 ms

raymond-zambaiti.png

raymond-zambaiti.png

292 ms

rswm.png

rswm.png

281 ms

siyarams.png

siyarams.png

245 ms

sultanpure.png

sultanpure.png

257 ms

sutlej.png

sutlej.png

255 ms

vardhman-logo.png

vardhman-logo.png

249 ms

logo.png

logo.png

217 ms

Accessibility Review

fabricinspection.com accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

fabricinspection.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

fabricinspection.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fabricinspection.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Fabricinspection.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

fabricinspection.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Fabric Inspection. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: