6.5 sec in total
28 ms
2.9 sec
3.6 sec
Click here to check amazing Face Shields content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about face-shields.com
FaceShields™ - Durable, reusable and lightweight face shields manufactured in the USA. Wholesale and large quantity discounts.
Visit face-shields.comWe analyzed Face-shields.com page load time and found that the first response time was 28 ms and then it took 6.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
face-shields.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.5 s
1/100
10%
Value17.8 s
0/100
25%
Value14.5 s
1/100
10%
Value14,630 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value24.0 s
1/100
10%
28 ms
254 ms
826 ms
421 ms
260 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Face-shields.com, 59% (47 requests) were made to Faceshields.com and 18% (14 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Faceshields.com.
Page size can be reduced by 145.7 kB (16%)
894.5 kB
748.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Face-shields.com main page is 894.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 559.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 42.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.3 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Face Shields images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 942 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 98.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Face-shields.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 98.7 kB or 65% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (72%)
60
17
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Face Shields. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
face-shields.com
28 ms
faceshields.com
254 ms
www.faceshields.com
826 ms
autoptimize_499997b7d1be164394c25435e73923fa.css
421 ms
all.css
260 ms
css
182 ms
dashicons.min.css
355 ms
css
195 ms
v4-shims.css
300 ms
jquery.min.js
314 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
252 ms
autoptimize_single_a82e1fc72d111aafd648fa0795c48fad.js
252 ms
autoptimize_single_df359d8ed4dfab28e65067d535bf9ca4.js
253 ms
4168784045.js
181 ms
wow.min.js
168 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
188 ms
js
197 ms
snippet.js
187 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
301 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
297 ms
autoptimize_single_6ad9165b167d54947b37f4b9de75ab39.js
296 ms
autoptimize_single_efc005d543649397f40de5ee26412332.js
348 ms
autoptimize_single_5dccdb539f2edcbadd56c95eaf9f9211.js
350 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
349 ms
superfish.min.js
356 ms
superfish.args.min.js
392 ms
skip-links.min.js
484 ms
responsive-menus.min.js
485 ms
common.min.js
485 ms
mobile-menu.min.js
494 ms
wp-embed.min.js
495 ms
autoptimize_single_dc6ac51b3ac0b141428388704ee4efd6.js
494 ms
autoptimize_single_d9bc53e409131fbe9fa92c9f6ae5a867.js
493 ms
autoptimize_single_8c23fc41be2cda3f5c798048ca5cd539.js
494 ms
autoptimize_single_721bba357e48618ddec4d69e85a5521e.js
775 ms
e-202240.js
146 ms
css
97 ms
css
102 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
217 ms
faceshields-2-workforce.svg
163 ms
shape.svg
168 ms
shape4.svg
167 ms
shape5.svg
167 ms
ppe-face-shield-1.jpg
869 ms
shape.svg
165 ms
shape2.svg
213 ms
ppe-face-shields-2.jpg
960 ms
faceshield-blue.svg
217 ms
black-arrow.svg
214 ms
dental-face-shield.jpg
953 ms
MediaBlink_Logo.png
865 ms
mediablink-quotes-blue.svg
866 ms
logo-03.jpg
866 ms
logo-04.jpg
1096 ms
logo-02.jpg
1099 ms
logo-01.jpg
1102 ms
logo-05.jpg
1098 ms
logo-06.jpg
1096 ms
44090422-d696-4c54-b4d1-fe552e8383fa
167 ms
analytics.js
810 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf
776 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf
809 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf
814 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CIPrQ.ttf
814 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf
814 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf
815 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrQ.ttf
825 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrQ.ttf
817 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4Y_LDrMfJQ.ttf
824 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4ejLDrMfJQ.ttf
824 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4cHLDrMfJQ.ttf
816 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4bbLDrMfJQ.ttf
822 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4VrMDrMfJQ.ttf
826 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4WjMDrMfJQ.ttf
826 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
805 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
1000 ms
black-arrow.svg
275 ms
web-widget-framework-96c2ac7dafdad68c4a30.js
79 ms
collect
48 ms
face-shields.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
face-shields.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
face-shields.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Face-shields.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Face-shields.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
face-shields.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Face Shields. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: