Tools & Wizards About Us
facemap.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 40

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    59% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

facemap.in

FACEMAP Infotechnologies - Facial Recognition System

Page Load Speed

5 sec in total

First Response

963 ms

Resources Loaded

3.7 sec

Page Rendered

321 ms

facemap.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing FACEMAP content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about facemap.in

FACEMAP Infotechnologies is an IT company with a specific focus on Face Recognition Technology which offers highly accurate and easy to use personal identification and verification products.

Visit facemap.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Facemap.in page load time and found that the first response time was 963 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

facemap.in performance score

40

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.3 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value130 ms

96/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.291

41/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.2 s

40/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.facemap.in

963 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

212 ms

css

23 ms

style.css

391 ms

bootstrap.css

610 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Facemap.in, 12% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Facemap.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 78.6 kB (10%)

Content Size

782.4 kB

After Optimization

703.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Facemap.in main page is 782.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 605.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 18.8 kB

  • Original 24.5 kB
  • After minification 22.0 kB
  • After compression 5.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.8 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 21.0 kB

  • Original 605.6 kB
  • After minification 584.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. FACEMAP images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-34%

Potential reduce by 32.1 kB

  • Original 93.8 kB
  • After minification 93.8 kB
  • After compression 61.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.1 kB or 34% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 6.7 kB

  • Original 58.4 kB
  • After minification 58.4 kB
  • After compression 51.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Facemap.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.7 kB or 12% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (64%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

12

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of FACEMAP. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.facemap.in

www.facemap.in

963 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

212 ms

css

css

23 ms

style.css

style.css

391 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

610 ms

default.css

default.css

405 ms

theme-menu.css

theme-menu.css

411 ms

media-responsive.css

media-responsive.css

419 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

422 ms

css-tooltips.css

css-tooltips.css

585 ms

default.min.css

default.min.css

608 ms

wtstyle.css

wtstyle.css

620 ms

css

css

39 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

637 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

626 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

779 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

1018 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

808 ms

menu.js

menu.js

833 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

828 ms

js

js

62 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

850 ms

custom.js

custom.js

985 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

1008 ms

FIT_Banner_09AUG2017.jpg

FIT_Banner_09AUG2017.jpg

793 ms

Facemap-InfoTechnologies.jpeg

Facemap-InfoTechnologies.jpeg

439 ms

Facemap-InfotechnologiesFIT-FACE-Recognition-Machine.jpg

Facemap-InfotechnologiesFIT-FACE-Recognition-Machine.jpg

418 ms

doorlock-copy-1.jpg

doorlock-copy-1.jpg

387 ms

FIT-Client01.jpg

FIT-Client01.jpg

395 ms

FIT-Client02.jpg

FIT-Client02.jpg

399 ms

FIT-Client03.jpg

FIT-Client03.jpg

582 ms

FIT-Client05.jpg

FIT-Client05.jpg

600 ms

Ramana01_1.jpg

Ramana01_1.jpg

601 ms

srishant-garu_for-website-purpose.jpg

srishant-garu_for-website-purpose.jpg

628 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

779 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

896 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxP.ttf

10 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc9.ttf

22 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc9.ttf

24 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxGIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxGIzc.ttf

22 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc9.ttf

23 ms

Accessibility Review

facemap.in accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

facemap.in best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

facemap.in SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Facemap.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Facemap.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

facemap.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of FACEMAP. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: