Tools & Wizards About Us
faceplantskincare.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

faceplantskincare.com

Face Plant Skincare, LLC | organic natural skincare

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

98 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

57 ms

faceplantskincare.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Face Plant Skincare content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about faceplantskincare.com

Face Plant Skincare, LLC provides organic, natural products handmade in Southern California.

Visit faceplantskincare.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Faceplantskincare.com page load time and found that the first response time was 98 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

faceplantskincare.com performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value10.0 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.5 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value840 ms

34/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.071

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.7 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.faceplantskincare.com

98 ms

minified.js

51 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

49 ms

polyfill.min.js

49 ms

mobile-app-invite-banner.css

47 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Faceplantskincare.com, 33% (15 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 31% (14 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (832 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 630.0 kB (49%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

661.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Faceplantskincare.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 758.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 613.1 kB

  • Original 758.4 kB
  • After minification 756.6 kB
  • After compression 145.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 613.1 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 13.2 kB

  • Original 231.0 kB
  • After minification 217.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Face Plant Skincare images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 300.4 kB
  • After minification 300.4 kB
  • After compression 296.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 56 B

  • Original 1.4 kB
  • After minification 1.4 kB
  • After compression 1.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Faceplantskincare.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (34%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

21

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Face Plant Skincare. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.faceplantskincare.com

www.faceplantskincare.com

98 ms

minified.js

minified.js

51 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

49 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

49 ms

mobile-app-invite-banner.css

mobile-app-invite-banner.css

47 ms

mobile-app-invite-banner.umd.min.js

mobile-app-invite-banner.umd.min.js

49 ms

thunderbolt-commons.b70ee867.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.b70ee867.bundle.min.js

113 ms

main.317ed945.bundle.min.js

main.317ed945.bundle.min.js

144 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

112 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

112 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

112 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

144 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

154 ms

c4a1e9_dea235b80d0244e2a2e68338147d1054~mv2.png

c4a1e9_dea235b80d0244e2a2e68338147d1054~mv2.png

263 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

70 ms

a3c153_b61b624117074ddc925cfccaabf87368~mv2.png

a3c153_b61b624117074ddc925cfccaabf87368~mv2.png

244 ms

c4a1e9_a4aa86d2d777410a9bae006287fa63a6~mv2.png

c4a1e9_a4aa86d2d777410a9bae006287fa63a6~mv2.png

445 ms

c4a1e9_a5a1b4e489fe48edaac5ea3485a5ca13~mv2.jpg

c4a1e9_a5a1b4e489fe48edaac5ea3485a5ca13~mv2.jpg

475 ms

c4a1e9_68dbeb349cb64067bf0a8ad3b5eda8dc~mv2.jpg

c4a1e9_68dbeb349cb64067bf0a8ad3b5eda8dc~mv2.jpg

404 ms

c4a1e9_543fa61662f046ad8d784358aa4affa6~mv2.jpg

c4a1e9_543fa61662f046ad8d784358aa4affa6~mv2.jpg

447 ms

c4a1e9_1775a27f796f4d168a56b1cc8cca6df4~mv2.jpg

c4a1e9_1775a27f796f4d168a56b1cc8cca6df4~mv2.jpg

462 ms

c4a1e9_1e003377b7e2496dbee84d1cba31bfc5~mv2.jpg

c4a1e9_1e003377b7e2496dbee84d1cba31bfc5~mv2.jpg

432 ms

c4a1e9_15af9c05c0de435aa2a122267880fc45~mv2.jpg

c4a1e9_15af9c05c0de435aa2a122267880fc45~mv2.jpg

636 ms

c4a1e9_5b362a2f4dc94757bf46a309d11aff38~mv2.jpg

c4a1e9_5b362a2f4dc94757bf46a309d11aff38~mv2.jpg

661 ms

c4a1e9_e8464db011914ded985ab018383dabee~mv2.jpg

c4a1e9_e8464db011914ded985ab018383dabee~mv2.jpg

623 ms

c4a1e9_eaccea4423b7474b8a4a216cd8480995~mv2.jpg

c4a1e9_eaccea4423b7474b8a4a216cd8480995~mv2.jpg

730 ms

c4a1e9_04193b63de0b463ba827c63c3852e8e8~mv2.jpg

c4a1e9_04193b63de0b463ba827c63c3852e8e8~mv2.jpg

661 ms

c4a1e9_fa5f5d299b87447e8acdc3f590a65f4f~mv2.jpg

c4a1e9_fa5f5d299b87447e8acdc3f590a65f4f~mv2.jpg

748 ms

c4a1e9_297fd2db32d44b35af8379670b1979d8~mv2.jpg

c4a1e9_297fd2db32d44b35af8379670b1979d8~mv2.jpg

832 ms

94 ms

109 ms

108 ms

104 ms

107 ms

106 ms

127 ms

147 ms

142 ms

138 ms

138 ms

138 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

8 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

10 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

12 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

4 ms

Accessibility Review

faceplantskincare.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

faceplantskincare.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

faceplantskincare.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Faceplantskincare.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Faceplantskincare.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

faceplantskincare.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Face Plant Skincare. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: