22 sec in total
1.6 sec
20 sec
483 ms
Welcome to faflower.com homepage info - get ready to check Faflower best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about faflower.com
faflower.com
Visit faflower.comWe analyzed Faflower.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 20.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.
faflower.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.5 s
96/100
10%
Value1.8 s
99/100
25%
Value2.1 s
99/100
10%
Value140 ms
95/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value3.0 s
95/100
10%
1591 ms
5271 ms
750 ms
5046 ms
148 ms
Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Faflower.com, 23% (8 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 20% (7 requests) were made to 4.cn. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (13.1 sec) relates to the external source 4.cn.
Page size can be reduced by 117.0 kB (40%)
295.8 kB
178.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Faflower.com main page is 295.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 112.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 6.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.1 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Faflower images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 48.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 48.6 kB or 45% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 54.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Faflower.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 54.0 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (61%)
33
13
The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Faflower. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
faflower.com
1591 ms
jquery.js
5271 ms
style.css
750 ms
stencil.css
5046 ms
show_ads.js
148 ms
stat.php
1777 ms
2882802.js
1223 ms
a-header-bg.jpg
388 ms
a-banner.jpg
13148 ms
icon.png
784 ms
a-pic.jpg
1892 ms
ca-pub-3967079123942817.js
352 ms
zrt_lookup.html
341 ms
show_ads_impl.js
641 ms
a-content-bg.jpg
748 ms
stat.htm
309 ms
core.php
1415 ms
ads
278 ms
osd.js
134 ms
ads
466 ms
ads
469 ms
m_js_controller.js
325 ms
abg.js
414 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
245 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
113 ms
x_button_blue2.png
105 ms
s
71 ms
9.gif
779 ms
pic.gif
1232 ms
icon_7.gif
3765 ms
j6SDDiQit5YY48GNgPpnCluJgoNCzbKlh5o6eVjReZI.js
65 ms
app.gif
1854 ms
activeview
320 ms
activeview
175 ms
activeview
191 ms
faflower.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
faflower.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
faflower.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Faflower.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Faflower.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
faflower.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Faflower. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: