104.6 sec in total
854 ms
64.7 sec
39 sec
Click here to check amazing Failbook content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about failbook.com
With over a billion users on Facebook, only seems natural that we have a good amount of FAILS from all that.
Visit failbook.comWe analyzed Failbook.com page load time and found that the first response time was 854 ms and then it took 103.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 24 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
failbook.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
75/100
10%
Value11.8 s
0/100
25%
Value20.2 s
0/100
10%
Value10,820 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.005
100/100
15%
Value44.7 s
0/100
10%
854 ms
1352 ms
699 ms
337 ms
4048 ms
Our browser made a total of 102 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Failbook.com, 10% (10 requests) were made to S.chzbgr.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Jadserve.postrelease.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (24.1 sec) relates to the external source I.chzbgr.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.9 MB (39%)
7.5 MB
4.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Failbook.com main page is 7.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 222.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 49.8 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 222.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 348.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Failbook images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.0 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.0 MB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 318.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Failbook.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 318.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (64%)
72
26
The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Failbook. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
failbook
854 ms
nw_chzboot.less
1352 ms
load.js
699 ms
cmnUNT.js
337 ms
main-moist.js
4048 ms
chartbeat_mab.js
622 ms
onejs
577 ms
t
8322 ms
10412 ms
nw_icons.png
20582 ms
FailBlog.png
9613 ms
20903 ms
20904 ms
20904 ms
20903 ms
20904 ms
20904 ms
htw-complex-media.js
15489 ms
gpt.js
15436 ms
ga.js
15436 ms
var=ccauds
20260 ms
cc.js
20294 ms
trk.gif
1810 ms
connatix.renderer.infeed.min.js
14412 ms
trk.gif
11572 ms
trk.gif
11663 ms
2992 ms
ctoolbar.min.js
13664 ms
analytics.js
11492 ms
beacon.js
13662 ms
quant.js
13410 ms
visitor
8786 ms
sdk.js
9875 ms
swap.js
0 ms
twoview_bootstrap.js
13371 ms
roboto-bold.ttf
0 ms
roboto-medium.ttf
0 ms
roboto-regular.ttf
0 ms
IcoMoon.woff
17147 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
17146 ms
loader
14602 ms
getad
0 ms
cmn-jquery-1.10.2.js
7722 ms
amzn_ads.js
14356 ms
Scores
8923 ms
FailBook.png
5127 ms
14141 ms
14037 ms
14020 ms
14020 ms
14021 ms
13917 ms
24119 ms
24135 ms
10298.js
12867 ms
pubads_impl_147.js
23055 ms
jquery.tools.min.js
6506 ms
21539 ms
0sTQzbapM8j.js
9265 ms
0sTQzbapM8j.js
21879 ms
page.php
21879 ms
89363.js
19482 ms
pinit.js
9274 ms
bundle.js
9378 ms
21831 ms
pls
19351 ms
1
19269 ms
rules-p-75z9nhQwNH4Ek.js
9145 ms
twoview-1.0.js
21580 ms
ctoolbar.desktop.min.css
7873 ms
collect
8890 ms
collect
22729 ms
bid
19077 ms
collect
21658 ms
sync
9936 ms
6491 ms
ir
9665 ms
t
9369 ms
sp_KgGEdqy2
10054 ms
bundle.js
10623 ms
pixel;r=1868097271;rf.1=0;a.1=p-75z9nhQwNH4Ek;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffailblog.cheezburger.com%2Ffailbook;fpan=1;fpa=P0-1182979989-1504630442935;ns=0;ce=1;cm=;ref=;je=0;sr=1024x768x32;enc=n;dst=0;et=1504630442934;tzo=-180;ogl=site_name.Failbook%2Curl.http%3A%2F%2Ffailblog%252Echeezburger%252Ecom%2Ffailbook%2Ctitle.Failbook%2Cdescription.With%20over%20a%20billion%20users%20on%20Facebook%252C%20only%20seems%20natural%20that%20we%20have%20a%20good%20am%2Ctype.website%2Cimage.https%3A%2F%2Fi%252Echzbgr%252Ecom%2Foriginal%2F7459954688%2Fh51B4762A%2F1%2Cimage%3Awidth.500%2Cimage%3Aheight.454
4157 ms
ima3.js
3880 ms
pinit_main.js
3269 ms
3936634.jpeg
7158 ms
3936349.jpeg
7110 ms
3936389.jpeg
6385 ms
sm.js
9735 ms
logo_black.png
7506 ms
napi.jsonp
4057 ms
447e7e09-fffb-4618-bf73-16724774720d.jpg
6925 ms
bridge3.178.0_en.html
2161 ms
client.js
3716 ms
6273038-00001-0.jpg
3712 ms
sp.js
3242 ms
get
2354 ms
I5YL3XhodRRsVWZe4NnZOhWnSAWgxhMoEr6SmzZieF43Mk7ZOBdeCVGrp9Eu+54J2xhySplfB5XHwQLXUmT9KH6+kPnQ7ZYuIEzNyfs1DLU1VU4SWZ6LkXGHsD1ZKbMw=
102 ms
1x1.gif
4641 ms
collect
688 ms
collect
2978 ms
attach-messages-count.6cb9a7b8b25ac23b102b.js
420 ms
api
759 ms
i
161 ms
failbook.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
failbook.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
failbook.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Failbook.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Failbook.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
failbook.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Failbook. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: