Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 64% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    65% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

failforum.net

Fail Forum - banju district, gundam headquarters, philosophical life and jokes we think!

Page Load Speed

7.8 sec in total

First Response

663 ms

Resources Loaded

6.8 sec

Page Rendered

264 ms

failforum.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Fail Forum content for China. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about failforum.net

HKFF 失敗論壇 - Discuz! Board

Visit failforum.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Failforum.net page load time and found that the first response time was 663 ms and then it took 7.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

failforum.net performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

86/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

45/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.4 s

56/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,790 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.273

45/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.0 s

26/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

index.php

663 ms

style_7.css

1077 ms

style_7_append.css

432 ms

common.js

657 ms

menu.js

656 ms

Our browser made a total of 107 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 36% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Failforum.net, 26% (28 requests) were made to Cdn-html.adsfactor.net and 6% (6 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Failforum.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 670.9 kB (60%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

450.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Failforum.net main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 474.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 52.9 kB

  • Original 63.8 kB
  • After minification 50.8 kB
  • After compression 10.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.0 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 52.9 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-37%

Potential reduce by 175.7 kB

  • Original 474.4 kB
  • After minification 298.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Fail Forum needs image optimization as it can save up to 175.7 kB or 37% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 289.4 kB

  • Original 397.5 kB
  • After minification 338.6 kB
  • After compression 108.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 289.4 kB or 73% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 152.9 kB

  • Original 185.4 kB
  • After minification 167.2 kB
  • After compression 32.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Failforum.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 152.9 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (55%)

Requests Now

101

After Optimization

45

The browser has sent 101 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fail Forum. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

failforum.net accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

failforum.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

failforum.net SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    BIG5-HKSCS

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Failforum.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Failforum.net main page’s claimed encoding is big5-hkscs. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Fail Forum. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: