3.3 sec in total
406 ms
2.6 sec
367 ms
Visit fashionoma.com now to see the best up-to-date Fashionoma content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about fashionoma.com
Zencommerce Ecommerce platform
Visit fashionoma.comWe analyzed Fashionoma.com page load time and found that the first response time was 406 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Fashionoma.com rating and web reputation
fashionoma.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
20/100
10%
Value5.4 s
20/100
25%
Value4.2 s
78/100
10%
Value1,200 ms
20/100
30%
Value0.078
95/100
15%
Value7.0 s
53/100
10%
406 ms
242 ms
593 ms
127 ms
473 ms
Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Fashionoma.com, 10% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 10% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Fashionoma.com.
Page size can be reduced by 108.0 kB (78%)
138.1 kB
30.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Fashionoma.com main page is 138.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 81.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 74.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 42.1 kB, which is 52% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 74.5 kB or 91% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 33.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 33.5 kB or 59% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (26%)
35
26
The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fashionoma. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
fashionoma.com
406 ms
NzoxOjA6ZW5fSU46MTowOm1haW46NS43LjY.css
242 ms
NzoxOjA6ZW5fSU46MDoxOm1haW4tanE6NS43LjY.js
593 ms
1px.gif
127 ms
logo.png
473 ms
c_1.jpg
789 ms
c_2.jpg
1025 ms
c_3.jpg
1021 ms
c_4.jpg
1024 ms
c_5.jpg
1137 ms
c_6.jpg
712 ms
f1.png
832 ms
t1.png
908 ms
g1.png
951 ms
payment_icon.png
1026 ms
gtm.js
48 ms
logo_background.png
1052 ms
basket_icon.png
1121 ms
menu_devider.png
1123 ms
header_line2.png
1124 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
56 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
58 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
59 ms
mnpfi9pxYH-Go5UiibESIqCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
59 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1106 ms
300_300_productGfx_c2a51c9d685626309ff13871958a418b.jpg
1083 ms
300_300_productGfx_a9bb38a1dfda9c6ed5ce2d6f44ba36a2.jpg
1151 ms
300_300_productGfx_32cbbe348522860b700ef2c37ad536ae.jpg
1154 ms
300_300_productGfx_9d2f8f2d95e03fb127a077cf56ac7d61.jpg
1156 ms
300_300_productGfx_605044f6614ebcb80bf9948c284617c6.jpg
1158 ms
300_300_productGfx_d417321fb0ae2c60b002600fb6fd3358.jpg
1169 ms
300_300_productGfx_ad3b4d1e3062e7ac8c4fe07872c11ed4.jpg
1201 ms
ff49be824f4af3faf2c5fca1f01f6d25.jpg
1390 ms
5bbcce0205873dd9ff364f781ddb95bc.jpg
1276 ms
715619a400e9eba2e3a3c14aece9fc5b.jpg
1393 ms
ico_arrow_left_small.png
1276 ms
ico_arrow_right_small.png
1287 ms
analytics.js
8 ms
linkid.js
4 ms
ec.js
6 ms
collect
4 ms
collect
61 ms
fashionoma.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
fashionoma.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
fashionoma.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fashionoma.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Fashionoma.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
fashionoma.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Fashionoma. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: