14.1 sec in total
3 sec
10.3 sec
742 ms
Click here to check amazing Fashionreview content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about fashionreview.co.uk
The domain name fashionreview.co.uk is for sale. Make an offer or buy it now at a set price.
Visit fashionreview.co.ukWe analyzed Fashionreview.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 3 sec and then it took 11 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
fashionreview.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0.8 s
100/100
10%
Value0.8 s
100/100
25%
Value0.8 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.096
91/100
15%
Value0.8 s
100/100
10%
3038 ms
432 ms
777 ms
473 ms
36 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 54% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Fashionreview.co.uk, 11% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (6 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Fashionreview.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 800.4 kB (34%)
2.3 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Fashionreview.co.uk main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 54.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.3 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 37.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fashionreview images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 457.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 457.9 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 250.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fashionreview.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 250.3 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (67%)
63
21
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fashionreview. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.fashionreview.co.uk
3038 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
432 ms
f-output.css
777 ms
layerslider.css
473 ms
css
36 ms
pagenavi-css.css
475 ms
icon.css
744 ms
css
41 ms
greensock.js
732 ms
jquery.js
732 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
655 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
939 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
710 ms
x-head.min.js
890 ms
x-shortcodes-head.min.js
1021 ms
adsbygoogle.js
20 ms
js_composer.min.css
1278 ms
prettyPhoto.css
844 ms
owl.carousel.css
845 ms
owl.theme.default.css
969 ms
animate.min.css
1052 ms
x-body.min.js
1053 ms
x-icon.min.js
1274 ms
comment-reply.min.js
1274 ms
x-shortcodes-body.min.js
1276 ms
js_composer_front.js
1307 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
1442 ms
owl.carousel.js
1516 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
1516 ms
underscore.min.js
1516 ms
waypoints.min.js
1514 ms
vc_grid_style_all.js
1855 ms
vc_grid_style_load_more.js
1854 ms
vc_grid_style_lazy.js
1855 ms
vc_grid_style_pagination.js
1855 ms
vc_grid.js
1855 ms
fashion_review_london.png
981 ms
4GwpJM7qx9X5Obd9KsnKxQ.ttf
21 ms
BTu4SsVveqk58cdYjlaM9g.ttf
22 ms
vDvcuXwZxUMLuTfuLrSLpA.ttf
28 ms
zpv3sOKAbMf4wff105oLjw.ttf
21 ms
5pEc4QKTMA2oB4Hi9NkS4w.ttf
16 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1961 ms
london_fashion_blog_banner_smaller.png
4351 ms
fr_circle.png
1441 ms
ca-pub-8394234131868379.js
458 ms
zrt_lookup.html
511 ms
show_ads_impl.js
227 ms
AcvTq8Q0lyKKNxRlL28Rn6CWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
227 ms
LgcV55siz7BRNdbO3Huj5g.ttf
226 ms
ads
469 ms
ads
448 ms
osd.js
368 ms
ads
423 ms
css
814 ms
m_js_controller.js
538 ms
abg.js
656 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
815 ms
6701103340187337465
783 ms
afr.php
916 ms
analytics.js
577 ms
skin.css
625 ms
x_button_blue2.png
185 ms
s
347 ms
favicon
440 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
208 ms
collect
338 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
444 ms
56c34079e4b08e502a2133a4-300x250.jpg
593 ms
veBs87dwiCXgZb9CwomBYiW1hyWXgp0ohA3Vj3gnbUg.js
299 ms
skin.png
286 ms
blank.gif
287 ms
loading.gif
239 ms
activeview
24 ms
fashionreview.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
fashionreview.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
fashionreview.co.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fashionreview.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Fashionreview.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
fashionreview.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Fashionreview. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: