Tools & Wizards About Us
fatfire.blog screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

fatfire.blog

FatFIRE in the UK - A Dad's guide to early retirement with all the trimmings

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

9 ms

Resources Loaded

1 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

fatfire.blog screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing FatFIRE content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about fatfire.blog

A UK Dad's journey to a comfortable Financial Independence and FatFIRE with two kids and middle class expenses.

Visit fatfire.blog

Key Findings

We analyzed Fatfire.blog page load time and found that the first response time was 9 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

fatfire.blog performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

93/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.4 s

75/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value850 ms

34/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.458

19/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.9 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

fatfire.blog

9 ms

fatfire.blog

346 ms

jquery.min.js

48 ms

css

90 ms

92 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 43% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Fatfire.blog, 26% (9 requests) were made to I0.wp.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (413 ms) relates to the external source I0.wp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 124.1 kB (11%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Fatfire.blog main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 799.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 115.4 kB

  • Original 142.5 kB
  • After minification 139.3 kB
  • After compression 27.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 115.4 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

  • Original 799.7 kB
  • After minification 798.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. FatFIRE images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 7.3 kB

  • Original 200.1 kB
  • After minification 200.1 kB
  • After compression 192.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 35.7 kB
  • After minification 35.7 kB
  • After compression 35.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fatfire.blog has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (53%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of FatFIRE. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

fatfire.blog

fatfire.blog

9 ms

fatfire.blog

fatfire.blog

346 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

48 ms

css

css

90 ms

92 ms

bilmur.min.js

bilmur.min.js

90 ms

90 ms

gprofiles.js

gprofiles.js

44 ms

124 ms

e-202410.js

e-202410.js

101 ms

146 ms

index.min.js

index.min.js

88 ms

gifting-banner.js

gifting-banner.js

155 ms

160 ms

201336_64da614f.jpg

201336_64da614f.jpg

148 ms

pexels-photo-2397414-1.jpeg

pexels-photo-2397414-1.jpeg

260 ms

pexels-photo-6648788.jpeg

pexels-photo-6648788.jpeg

267 ms

euro-coins-currency-money-106152.jpeg

euro-coins-currency-money-106152.jpeg

371 ms

pexels-photo-235731.jpeg

pexels-photo-235731.jpeg

257 ms

pexels-photo-6176692.jpeg

pexels-photo-6176692.jpeg

271 ms

pexels-photo-7640764.jpeg

pexels-photo-7640764.jpeg

246 ms

pexels-photo-288394.jpeg

pexels-photo-288394.jpeg

413 ms

pexels-photo-7089020.jpeg

pexels-photo-7089020.jpeg

371 ms

cropped-img_0939-1.jpeg

cropped-img_0939-1.jpeg

139 ms

conf

conf

176 ms

ga.js

ga.js

135 ms

font

font

119 ms

148 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

11 ms

ata.js

ata.js

18 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

45 ms

font

font

32 ms

Genericons.svg

Genericons.svg

67 ms

8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=

8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=

30 ms

63 ms

Accessibility Review

fatfire.blog accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

fatfire.blog best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

fatfire.blog SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fatfire.blog can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fatfire.blog main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

fatfire.blog

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of FatFIRE. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: