Tools & Wizards About Us
faucetrocket.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

faucetrocket.com

faucetrocket.com - faucetrocket Resources and Information.

Page Load Speed

10.2 sec in total

First Response

4.3 sec

Resources Loaded

4.9 sec

Page Rendered

1 sec

faucetrocket.com screenshot

About Website

Visit faucetrocket.com now to see the best up-to-date Faucetrocket content for Argentina and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about faucetrocket.com

faucetrocket.com is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, faucetrocket.com has it all. We hope yo...

Visit faucetrocket.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Faucetrocket.com page load time and found that the first response time was 4.3 sec and then it took 5.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

faucetrocket.com performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.3 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.2 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value520 ms

57/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.3 s

49/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

4272 ms

725 ms

dashicons.min.css

312 ms

345 ms

9db34c8f50fca9a70223fb7297c1d8b9.js

317 ms

Our browser made a total of 16 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Faucetrocket.com, 13% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 6% (1 request) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.3 sec) relates to the external source Popx.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 151.9 kB (37%)

Content Size

405.8 kB

After Optimization

253.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Faucetrocket.com main page is 405.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 219.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 116.6 kB

  • Original 134.7 kB
  • After minification 104.2 kB
  • After compression 18.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 30.5 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 116.6 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 14.8 kB
  • After minification 14.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Faucetrocket images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 34.3 kB

  • Original 219.6 kB
  • After minification 219.6 kB
  • After compression 185.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 34.3 kB or 16% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 986 B

  • Original 36.7 kB
  • After minification 36.7 kB
  • After compression 35.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Faucetrocket.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (73%)

Requests Now

11

After Optimization

3

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Faucetrocket. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

4272 ms

725 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

312 ms

345 ms

9db34c8f50fca9a70223fb7297c1d8b9.js

9db34c8f50fca9a70223fb7297c1d8b9.js

317 ms

8a7462d185ed0ab8377e5b3750e2f1ea.js

8a7462d185ed0ab8377e5b3750e2f1ea.js

444 ms

530 ms

478 ms

e65ac1b7b6344d734699253f0fb16588.js

e65ac1b7b6344d734699253f0fb16588.js

468 ms

css

css

29 ms

css

css

14 ms

plain-white-background.jpg

plain-white-background.jpg

86 ms

font

font

30 ms

ionicons.woff

ionicons.woff

317 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

138 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

377 ms

Accessibility Review

faucetrocket.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

faucetrocket.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

faucetrocket.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Faucetrocket.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Faucetrocket.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

faucetrocket.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Faucetrocket. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: