Tools & Wizards About Us
favoriteappliance.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

favoriteappliance.com

Trust Awesome - Trustawesome.com

Page Load Speed

17.9 sec in total

First Response

3 sec

Resources Loaded

14.5 sec

Page Rendered

384 ms

favoriteappliance.com screenshot

About Website

Visit favoriteappliance.com now to see the best up-to-date Favoriteappliance content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about favoriteappliance.com

The Trust Awesome

Visit favoriteappliance.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Favoriteappliance.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3 sec and then it took 14.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

favoriteappliance.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

www.reviewswise.com

2988 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

825 ms

default-style.css

555 ms

bootstrap.min.css

558 ms

popovers.css

609 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Favoriteappliance.com, 10% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 8% (4 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.2 sec) relates to the external source Reviewswise.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 294.0 kB (45%)

Content Size

653.6 kB

After Optimization

359.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Favoriteappliance.com main page is 653.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 262.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 47.4 kB

  • Original 59.0 kB
  • After minification 54.9 kB
  • After compression 11.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.4 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 7.1 kB

  • Original 194.3 kB
  • After minification 187.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Favoriteappliance images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-49%

Potential reduce by 128.3 kB

  • Original 262.4 kB
  • After minification 258.6 kB
  • After compression 134.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 128.3 kB or 49% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 111.2 kB

  • Original 137.9 kB
  • After minification 124.0 kB
  • After compression 26.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Favoriteappliance.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 111.2 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (60%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

20

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Favoriteappliance. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.reviewswise.com

www.reviewswise.com

2988 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

825 ms

default-style.css

default-style.css

555 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

558 ms

popovers.css

popovers.css

609 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

2409 ms

style.css

style.css

1461 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

827 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

1650 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

3301 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

2436 ms

customscript.js

customscript.js

1101 ms

html5.js

html5.js

85 ms

css

css

94 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

1039 ms

links.js

links.js

858 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1128 ms

popovers.js

popovers.js

1209 ms

devicepx-jetpack.js

devicepx-jetpack.js

100 ms

gprofiles.js

gprofiles.js

149 ms

wpgroho.js

wpgroho.js

1482 ms

jquery.cookie.js

jquery.cookie.js

1482 ms

e-201614.js

e-201614.js

1124 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

94 ms

linkid.js

linkid.js

74 ms

collect

collect

234 ms

collect

collect

266 ms

nobg.png

nobg.png

909 ms

Drawing.png

Drawing.png

606 ms

WELL-PRESSURE-TANK.jpg

WELL-PRESSURE-TANK.jpg

1386 ms

UNDER-CABINET-LED-LIGHTING.jpg

UNDER-CABINET-LED-LIGHTING.jpg

1636 ms

PORTABLE-CELL-PHONE-CHARGER.jpg

PORTABLE-CELL-PHONE-CHARGER.jpg

295 ms

3670G_2._SL250_.jpg

3670G_2._SL250_.jpg

1810 ms

41zP2uzl85L._SY400_.jpg

41zP2uzl85L._SY400_.jpg

906 ms

buyonamazon.jpeg

buyonamazon.jpeg

1791 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

5239 ms

ca-pub-5942243586525179.js

ca-pub-5942243586525179.js

261 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

318 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

618 ms

admin-ajax.php

admin-ajax.php

2164 ms

hovercard.css

hovercard.css

116 ms

services.css

services.css

220 ms

g.gif

g.gif

159 ms

ads

ads

306 ms

osd.js

osd.js

138 ms

18261835606876498963

18261835606876498963

300 ms

abg.js

abg.js

351 ms

m_js_controller.js

m_js_controller.js

391 ms

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

258 ms

x_button_blue2.png

x_button_blue2.png

69 ms

s

s

63 ms

j6SDDiQit5YY48GNgPpnCluJgoNCzbKlh5o6eVjReZI.js

j6SDDiQit5YY48GNgPpnCluJgoNCzbKlh5o6eVjReZI.js

34 ms

SEO Factors

favoriteappliance.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Favoriteappliance.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Favoriteappliance.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

favoriteappliance.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Favoriteappliance. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: