Tools & Wizards About Us
favouritetable.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

favouritetable.com

Online Restaurant Bookings and Reservations Services | Favouritetable

Page Load Speed

5.6 sec in total

First Response

203 ms

Resources Loaded

5.2 sec

Page Rendered

235 ms

favouritetable.com screenshot

About Website

Visit favouritetable.com now to see the best up-to-date Favouritetable content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about favouritetable.com

Favouritetable, a restaurant resource listing, providing restaurant bookings and reservations service online with some of the UK's top leading restaurants.

Visit favouritetable.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Favouritetable.com page load time and found that the first response time was 203 ms and then it took 5.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

favouritetable.com performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.1 s

31/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value640 ms

46/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.014

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.2 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

favouritetable.com

203 ms

www.favouritetable.com

507 ms

css

37 ms

bootstrap.min.css

665 ms

bootstrap-select.min.css

1029 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 9% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Favouritetable.com, 80% (35 requests) were made to Cdn.favouritetable.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) relates to the external source Cdn.favouritetable.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 223.4 kB (11%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Favouritetable.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 54.4 kB

  • Original 66.4 kB
  • After minification 55.7 kB
  • After compression 12.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.7 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.4 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 99.3 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Favouritetable images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 52.8 kB

  • Original 642.6 kB
  • After minification 642.6 kB
  • After compression 589.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 16.9 kB

  • Original 63.6 kB
  • After minification 63.6 kB
  • After compression 46.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Favouritetable.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 16.9 kB or 27% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (33%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

28

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Favouritetable. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

favouritetable.com

favouritetable.com

203 ms

www.favouritetable.com

www.favouritetable.com

507 ms

css

css

37 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

665 ms

bootstrap-select.min.css

bootstrap-select.min.css

1029 ms

bootstrap-datepicker.min.css

bootstrap-datepicker.min.css

1131 ms

b2c.min.css

b2c.min.css

1308 ms

jquery-3.2.1.min.js

jquery-3.2.1.min.js

1138 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

1110 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1259 ms

bootstrap-select.min.js

bootstrap-select.min.js

1503 ms

all.js

all.js

2010 ms

b2c.min.js

b2c.min.js

1467 ms

js

js

67 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

113 ms

bootstrap-datepicker.min.js

bootstrap-datepicker.min.js

1581 ms

moment-with-locales.min.js

moment-with-locales.min.js

1797 ms

spinner.gif

spinner.gif

459 ms

fav-logo.png

fav-logo.png

63 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

482 ms

43.jpg

43.jpg

423 ms

44.jpg

44.jpg

436 ms

46.jpg

46.jpg

462 ms

47.jpg

47.jpg

446 ms

48.jpg

48.jpg

924 ms

49.jpg

49.jpg

810 ms

54.jpg

54.jpg

924 ms

55.jpg

55.jpg

835 ms

56.jpg

56.jpg

1076 ms

58.jpg

58.jpg

1004 ms

64.jpg

64.jpg

1211 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

232 ms

4_new.jpg

4_new.jpg

1599 ms

search.png

search.png

1250 ms

LoadTrendingNowOnHome

LoadTrendingNowOnHome

237 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

31 ms

www.favouritetable.com

www.favouritetable.com

216 ms

star-Bigger.png

star-Bigger.png

853 ms

star-Bigger_half-more.png

star-Bigger_half-more.png

667 ms

star-Bigger_none.png

star-Bigger_none.png

675 ms

637317919930873575.png

637317919930873575.png

1495 ms

638180319242859712.jpg

638180319242859712.jpg

1211 ms

638211370179956135.png

638211370179956135.png

1737 ms

637609373080812684.jpg

637609373080812684.jpg

1368 ms

Accessibility Review

favouritetable.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

favouritetable.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

favouritetable.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Favouritetable.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Favouritetable.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

favouritetable.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Favouritetable. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: