3.8 sec in total
692 ms
2.5 sec
547 ms
Welcome to fayetracker.com homepage info - get ready to check FAYETRACKER best content right away, or after learning these important things about fayetracker.com
FayeTracker 4, stable version of AntiBlackHat FayeTracker can be launched with a USB key, not necessary to install it (possibly possible to copy on your hard drive).
Visit fayetracker.comWe analyzed Fayetracker.com page load time and found that the first response time was 692 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
fayetracker.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
23/100
10%
Value4.4 s
40/100
25%
Value10.5 s
7/100
10%
Value5,250 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value24.2 s
0/100
10%
692 ms
197 ms
201 ms
193 ms
480 ms
Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Fayetracker.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Microsofttranslator.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Fayetracker.com.
Page size can be reduced by 308.8 kB (39%)
785.7 kB
476.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Fayetracker.com main page is 785.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 445.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 24.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.4 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 62.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, FAYETRACKER needs image optimization as it can save up to 62.0 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 170.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 170.4 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 51.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fayetracker.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 51.6 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (62%)
39
15
The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of FAYETRACKER. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
fayetracker.com
692 ms
jcemediabox.css
197 ms
style.css
201 ms
mod_jflanguageselection.css
193 ms
mootools.js
480 ms
caption.js
196 ms
jcemediabox.js
328 ms
mediaobject.js
292 ms
default.js
294 ms
system.css
295 ms
general.css
304 ms
template.css
491 ms
jquery.js
580 ms
script.js
393 ms
Bottom_texture.png
114 ms
sheet_s.png
108 ms
sheet_h.png
109 ms
sheet_v.png
119 ms
sheet_c.png
106 ms
header.png
482 ms
header.jpg
387 ms
nav.png
200 ms
menuitem.png
197 ms
fr.gif
216 ms
en.gif
238 ms
blockheader.png
295 ms
ft4s.png
437 ms
FS4s.png
545 ms
imagedvd.gif
1333 ms
vmenublockheader.png
386 ms
vmenuitem.png
473 ms
widget.aspx
396 ms
footer_s.png
465 ms
footer_b.png
479 ms
ga.js
28 ms
popup.html
534 ms
tooltip.html
535 ms
menuseparator.png
536 ms
__utm.gif
32 ms
metrics.js
14 ms
fayetracker.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
fayetracker.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
fayetracker.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fayetracker.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fayetracker.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
fayetracker.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of FAYETRACKER. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: