8.4 sec in total
165 ms
7.7 sec
521 ms
Visit fbcburnet.org now to see the best up-to-date Fbc Burnet content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about fbcburnet.org
Visit fbcburnet.orgWe analyzed Fbcburnet.org page load time and found that the first response time was 165 ms and then it took 8.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
fbcburnet.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
59/100
10%
Value11.1 s
0/100
25%
Value12.3 s
3/100
10%
Value100 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.033
100/100
15%
Value9.8 s
27/100
10%
165 ms
5689 ms
179 ms
179 ms
181 ms
Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 46% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Fbcburnet.org, 25% (18 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 23% (16 requests) were made to Embed-cdn.spotifycdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Fbcburnet.org.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (25%)
4.9 MB
3.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Fbcburnet.org main page is 4.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 119.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 119.0 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.0 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Fbc Burnet needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 26% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 70.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 49.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fbcburnet.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 49.6 kB or 65% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (72%)
50
14
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fbc Burnet. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
fbcburnet.org
165 ms
fbcburnet.org
5689 ms
tribe-events-pro-mini-calendar-block.min.css
179 ms
light-box-styles.css
179 ms
swiper.min.css
181 ms
cff-style.min.css
184 ms
font-awesome.min.css
31 ms
style.min.css
129 ms
css
32 ms
style.css
181 ms
sharethis.js
17 ms
FBCLogo.png
366 ms
SUNDAYS.png
350 ms
TIMESshadow.png
350 ms
COVER.jpg
713 ms
Asset-3.png
663 ms
Photo-82-scaled.jpg
403 ms
3column3.jpg
397 ms
0f57OY0ova2CeHnjDYqpi8
499 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
348 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
376 ms
jquery.min.js
416 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
414 ms
giveonline.jpg
559 ms
swiper.min.js
461 ms
cff-scripts.min.js
479 ms
scripts.min.js
580 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
561 ms
frontend-bundle.min.js
579 ms
common.js
609 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
611 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
610 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
622 ms
homepagetopnotext2.jpg
574 ms
servicegraphic3-scaled.jpg
572 ms
preloader.gif
528 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1JlEA.ttf
107 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJnedw.ttf
114 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1JlEA.ttf
128 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1JlEA.ttf
128 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTufntF.ttf
119 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1JlEA.ttf
128 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1JlEA.ttf
128 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1JlEA.ttf
125 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1JlEA.ttf
129 ms
modules.ttf
1560 ms
pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmy15VGdeL.ttf
30 ms
pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm111VGdeL.ttf
32 ms
pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm81xVGdeL.ttf
32 ms
pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmr19VGdeL.ttf
33 ms
pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmg1hVGdeL.ttf
33 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLufntF.ttf
32 ms
pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm21lVGdeL.ttf
43 ms
pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmv1pVGdeL.ttf
43 ms
pxiAyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmE0tMMPc.ttf
42 ms
fd67e1fb69fabcc3.css
17 ms
c5abdefd4f05694f.css
19 ms
45ac58c8f877602b.css
23 ms
polyfills-78c92fac7aa8fdd8.js
31 ms
webpack-d5e915a063b63068.js
52 ms
framework-1c912989c69ab413.js
56 ms
main-4ab1044a8a334553.js
62 ms
_app-90253ea413625cce.js
66 ms
fec483df-893841093599befa.js
65 ms
370d8c6a-ba7b9fa33b972102.js
54 ms
2049-f4817b444e193068.js
62 ms
194-d2f4368186f3823d.js
64 ms
3666-5f9cd5919503457a.js
82 ms
%5Bid%5D-f852a6d5e0c3e2c5.js
80 ms
_buildManifest.js
80 ms
_ssgManifest.js
81 ms
fbcburnet.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
fbcburnet.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
fbcburnet.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fbcburnet.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fbcburnet.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
fbcburnet.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Fbc Burnet. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: