2.9 sec in total
514 ms
1.3 sec
1 sec
Click here to check amazing Fbdigital content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about fbdigital.in
We are the leading Digital Marketing agency dedicated to the goal of increasing your online presence and reliability with guaranteed results…be on the top and get more traffic and real followers.
Visit fbdigital.inWe analyzed Fbdigital.in page load time and found that the first response time was 514 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
fbdigital.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.8 s
1/100
10%
Value7.3 s
4/100
25%
Value13.0 s
2/100
10%
Value660 ms
45/100
30%
Value0.007
100/100
15%
Value17.0 s
4/100
10%
514 ms
38 ms
79 ms
346 ms
346 ms
Our browser made a total of 103 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (82 requests) were addressed to the original Fbdigital.in, 5% (5 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net and 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (538 ms) relates to the external source Seofy.webgeniuslab.net.
Page size can be reduced by 129.0 kB (49%)
263.0 kB
134.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Fbdigital.in main page is 263.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 146.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 116.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 116.6 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Fbdigital needs image optimization as it can save up to 12.0 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 506 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 17 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fbdigital.in has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (63%)
16
6
The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fbdigital. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
fbdigital.in
514 ms
webfont.js
38 ms
js
79 ms
style.min.css
346 ms
wc-blocks-vendors-style.css
346 ms
wc-blocks-style.css
346 ms
select2.css
189 ms
yith-wcaf.css
345 ms
style.min.css
345 ms
style.min.css
345 ms
style.min.css
345 ms
style.min.css
346 ms
style.min.css
346 ms
blocks.style.build.css
345 ms
styles.css
346 ms
formcraft-common.css
345 ms
form.css
346 ms
icomoon.css
346 ms
animate.css
346 ms
ptaofw-frontend.css
346 ms
css
71 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
345 ms
woocommerce.css
346 ms
common-style.css
345 ms
magnific-popup.css
346 ms
shortcode.css
346 ms
ywpi.css
345 ms
style.css
346 ms
style.css
346 ms
flaticon.css
347 ms
v4-shims.min.css
346 ms
all.min.css
347 ms
main.css
347 ms
default.min.css
342 ms
js_composer.min.css
343 ms
font-awesome.min.css
342 ms
style.css
342 ms
Defaults.css
345 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
346 ms
css
36 ms
js
127 ms
https:/?t=2
3 ms
css
82 ms
style.css
271 ms
analytics.js
22 ms
rs6.css
157 ms
collect
15 ms
jquery.min.js
18 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
17 ms
wow.js
17 ms
ptaofw-frontend.js
18 ms
rbtools.min.js
17 ms
rs6.min.js
17 ms
script.js
16 ms
core.min.js
70 ms
datepicker.min.js
70 ms
selectWoo.full.min.js
69 ms
yith-wcaf.min.js
69 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
68 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
68 ms
index.js
70 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
70 ms
js.cookie.min.js
71 ms
woocommerce.min.js
70 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
70 ms
jquery.slimscroll.min.js
69 ms
jquery.cookie.js
69 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
69 ms
qcld-woo-chatbot-plugin.js
69 ms
qcld-woo-chatbot-front.js
69 ms
theme-addons.js
68 ms
theme.js
68 ms
particles.min.js
67 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
67 ms
jquery.paroller.min.js
67 ms
fbevents.js
86 ms
maps8.png
538 ms
FBDigital-logo-150.png
47 ms
smusic.jpg
48 ms
Silver-Membership.png
48 ms
gold_membership2.jpeg
47 ms
Diamond-plan-540x540.png
47 ms
platinum_600x600.png
47 ms
music-platforms.jpeg
48 ms
section_about_us_02.png
48 ms
Vector-Smart-Object-copy-24.png
47 ms
ind-ads.jpg
50 ms
Publishers-1024x763.png
51 ms
googletrustedstore-300x129.png
51 ms
trustseals2-300x83.png
50 ms
chat.png
50 ms
pe0qMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8cce9I94.ttf
33 ms
pe03MImSLYBIv1o4X1M8cc9iB85tU1Q.ttf
35 ms
pe03MImSLYBIv1o4X1M8cc8GBs5tU1Q.ttf
84 ms
pe03MImSLYBIv1o4X1M8cc8aBc5tU1Q.ttf
83 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
221 ms
chat-bg.jpg
310 ms
sdk.js
14 ms
1Ptgg87LROyAm3Kz-Co.ttf
51 ms
identity.js
21 ms
1925061697770927
212 ms
sdk.js
49 ms
50 ms
fbdigital.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
fbdigital.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
fbdigital.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fbdigital.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fbdigital.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
fbdigital.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Fbdigital. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: