4.2 sec in total
369 ms
3.5 sec
293 ms
Visit fdl.li now to see the best up-to-date F D L content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about fdl.li
Retail and commercial Display, for small and large orders world-wide. View our catalog and price list online. Call us for the login details.
Visit fdl.liWe analyzed Fdl.li page load time and found that the first response time was 369 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
fdl.li performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
24/100
10%
Value21.9 s
0/100
25%
Value11.2 s
5/100
10%
Value390 ms
69/100
30%
Value1.124
1/100
15%
Value20.2 s
2/100
10%
369 ms
1040 ms
168 ms
264 ms
458 ms
Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Fdl.li, 3% (1 request) were made to Cdn-images.mailchimp.com and 3% (1 request) were made to S3.amazonaws.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Fdl.li.
Page size can be reduced by 631.2 kB (9%)
6.7 MB
6.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Fdl.li main page is 6.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 6.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 56.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 164.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. F D L images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 248.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 248.5 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 162.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fdl.li needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 162.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (57%)
28
12
The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of F D L. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
fdl.li
369 ms
fdl.li
1040 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
168 ms
bootstrap.min.css
264 ms
style.min.css
458 ms
style.css
279 ms
style.css
279 ms
hero-slider.min.css
277 ms
siteorigin.min.css
367 ms
font-awesome.min.css
358 ms
styles.min.css
550 ms
jquery.min.js
527 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
309 ms
classic-10_7.css
22 ms
mc-validate.js
49 ms
functions.min.js
399 ms
scripts.js
499 ms
hero-slider.js
410 ms
so-legacy.js
490 ms
so-legacy-main.min.js
500 ms
overlay-e1505941724770.png
128 ms
nl_NL.png
127 ms
de_DE.png
126 ms
fr_FR.png
125 ms
Slider1-dark-1.jpg
125 ms
Slider2-dark.jpg
186 ms
Slider3-dark.jpg
180 ms
Slider4.jpg
185 ms
FDLStand.jpg
184 ms
FDLlogomini.png
185 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
190 ms
Slider1-dark-1.jpg
637 ms
Slider3-dark.jpg
551 ms
FDLStand.jpg
464 ms
Slider4.jpg
555 ms
FDLlogomini.png
110 ms
Slider2-dark.jpg
462 ms
fdl.li accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
fdl.li best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
fdl.li SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fdl.li can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fdl.li main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
fdl.li
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of F D L. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: