2.7 sec in total
135 ms
2.5 sec
107 ms
Welcome to feat.engineering homepage info - get ready to check Feat best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about feat.engineering
A primary goal of predictive modeling is to find a reliable and effective predic- tive relationship between an available set of features and an outcome. This book provides an extensive set of techniqu...
Visit feat.engineeringWe analyzed Feat.engineering page load time and found that the first response time was 135 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
feat.engineering performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value11.9 s
0/100
10%
Value15.0 s
0/100
25%
Value12.1 s
4/100
10%
Value3,510 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.071
96/100
15%
Value19.5 s
2/100
10%
135 ms
18 ms
8 ms
79 ms
22 ms
Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Feat.engineering, 8% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (454 ms) belongs to the original domain Feat.engineering.
Page size can be reduced by 291.5 kB (73%)
401.4 kB
109.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Feat.engineering main page is 401.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 340.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 47.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.2 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 244.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 244.3 kB or 72% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (93%)
44
3
The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Feat. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
feat.engineering
135 ms
www.feat.engineering
18 ms
jquery.min.js
8 ms
style.css
79 ms
plugin-table.css
22 ms
plugin-bookdown.css
83 ms
plugin-highlight.css
23 ms
plugin-search.css
24 ms
plugin-fontsettings.css
30 ms
htmlwidgets.js
42 ms
leaflet.css
41 ms
leaflet.js
63 ms
leafletfix.css
33 ms
proj4-compressed.js
59 ms
proj4leaflet.js
61 ms
rstudio_leaflet.css
63 ms
leaflet.js
202 ms
leaflet-providers.js
64 ms
leaflet-providers-plugin.js
112 ms
plotly.js
112 ms
typedarray.min.js
117 ms
crosstalk.css
118 ms
crosstalk.min.js
110 ms
plotly-htmlwidgets.css
118 ms
plotly-latest.min.js
116 ms
d3.min.js
454 ms
d3-lasso.min.js
117 ms
styles.css
174 ms
ggiraphjs.min.js
197 ms
girafe.js
181 ms
kePrint.js
118 ms
FES.css
119 ms
app.min.js
119 ms
lunr.js
139 ms
plugin-search.js
159 ms
plugin-sharing.js
183 ms
plugin-fontsettings.js
450 ms
plugin-bookdown.js
172 ms
jquery.highlight.js
441 ms
css
29 ms
css
42 ms
css
48 ms
css
46 ms
search_index.json
173 ms
u-440qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l5-fCZJ.ttf
36 ms
u-4n0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l52xwNZWMf_.ttf
37 ms
fontawesome-webfont.ttf
36 ms
MathJax.js
16 ms
TeX-MML-AM_CHTML.js
4 ms
feat.engineering accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
feat.engineering best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
feat.engineering SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Feat.engineering can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Feat.engineering main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
feat.engineering
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Feat. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: