15.8 sec in total
3.8 sec
9 sec
3 sec
Click here to check amazing Feazer content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about feazer.com
Your own project managers and graphic designers specialized in your sector. All for an ultra-competitive fixed price.
Visit feazer.comWe analyzed Feazer.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3.8 sec and then it took 12 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
feazer.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.5 s
1/100
10%
Value7.5 s
4/100
25%
Value19.1 s
0/100
10%
Value990 ms
27/100
30%
Value0.107
88/100
15%
Value15.0 s
8/100
10%
3765 ms
170 ms
173 ms
176 ms
187 ms
Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Feazer.com, 20% (17 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Feazer.com.
Page size can be reduced by 378.8 kB (9%)
4.1 MB
3.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Feazer.com main page is 4.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 157.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 157.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 216.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Feazer images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 3.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Feazer.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (51%)
65
32
The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Feazer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.feazer.com
3765 ms
cursor.css
170 ms
close-button-icon.css
173 ms
YouTubePopUp.css
176 ms
style.min.css
187 ms
css
35 ms
magnific_popup.css
168 ms
swiper.css
170 ms
popup.css
171 ms
animate.css
177 ms
readmore.css
179 ms
jquery.min.js
341 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
258 ms
YouTubePopUp.jquery.js
261 ms
YouTubePopUp.js
264 ms
jquery.bind-first-0.2.3.min.js
269 ms
js.cookie-2.1.3.min.js
274 ms
public.js
430 ms
js
67 ms
et-core-unified-4430.min.css
353 ms
typed.js
354 ms
typed.fe.js
358 ms
detectmobilebrowser.js
363 ms
mystickymenu.min.js
424 ms
scripts.min.js
619 ms
common.js
516 ms
dsm-shuffle.js
517 ms
frontend.min.js
518 ms
motion-effects.js
619 ms
gtm.js
88 ms
Feazer-Final_Horizontal-RGB.png
775 ms
mockup_homepage.png
898 ms
Betclic.png
543 ms
Telerama.png
561 ms
Babilou.png
560 ms
Bjorg.png
655 ms
Getaround.png
628 ms
April.png
638 ms
Mooncard.png
643 ms
SVR.png
804 ms
Swile.png
729 ms
Sopra.png
821 ms
LaDepeche.png
748 ms
Isispharma.png
820 ms
Cegos.png
842 ms
ManoMano.png
859 ms
Meilleurtaux.png
892 ms
Lagardere.png
998 ms
VinciGroup.png
911 ms
Feazer_Benefits.png
1301 ms
Feazer-Solution.png
1031 ms
A-platform-and-processes-for-greater-efficiency.png
982 ms
Bjorg.png
1101 ms
Bjorg.jpeg
1010 ms
Feazer-Mooncard-youtube.png
1876 ms
mooncard.png
1122 ms
Isispharma.png
1481 ms
Isispharma.png
1128 ms
Feazer-Final_Horizontal-white-RGB-1.png
1234 ms
gtm.js
55 ms
et-divi-dynamic-tb-4901-4430-late.css
101 ms
js
186 ms
analytics.js
82 ms
js
180 ms
QldgNThLqRwH-OJ1UHjlKENVzkWGVkL3GZQmAwLYxYWI2qfdm7Lpp7c8WRP2kQ.woff
274 ms
QldgNThLqRwH-OJ1UHjlKENVzkWGVkL3GZQmAwLYxYWI2qfdm7Lpp4U8WRP2kQ.woff
318 ms
QldgNThLqRwH-OJ1UHjlKENVzkWGVkL3GZQmAwLYxYWI2qfdm7Lpp9s8WRP2kQ.woff
330 ms
QldgNThLqRwH-OJ1UHjlKENVzkWGVkL3GZQmAwLYxYWI2qfdm7LppwU8WRP2kQ.woff
329 ms
QldgNThLqRwH-OJ1UHjlKENVzkWGVkL3GZQmAwLYxYWI2qfdm7Lpp1s7WRP2kQ.woff
423 ms
QldgNThLqRwH-OJ1UHjlKENVzkWGVkL3GZQmAwLYxYWI2qfdm7Lpp2I7WRP2kQ.woff
380 ms
QldgNThLqRwH-OJ1UHjlKENVzkWGVkL3GZQmAwLYxYWI2qfdm7LppwU7WRP2kQ.woff
448 ms
QldgNThLqRwH-OJ1UHjlKENVzkWGVkL3GZQmAwLYxYWI2qfdm7Lppyw7WRP2kQ.woff
380 ms
Magica.otf
1212 ms
K2FifZFYk-dHSE0UPPuwQ7CrD94i-NCKm-U4rs1wpRnF.woff
363 ms
K2FifZFYk-dHSE0UPPuwQ7CrD94i-NCKm-U4cM1wpRnF.woff
363 ms
K2FifZFYk-dHSE0UPPuwQ7CrD94i-NCKm-U48MxwpRnF.woff
412 ms
K2FifZFYk-dHSE0UPPuwQ7CrD94i-NCKm-U48M1wpRnF.woff
397 ms
K2FifZFYk-dHSE0UPPuwQ7CrD94i-NCKm-U4ws1wpRnF.woff
380 ms
K2FifZFYk-dHSE0UPPuwQ7CrD94i-NCKm-U4LspwpRnF.woff
438 ms
K2FifZFYk-dHSE0UPPuwQ7CrD94i-NCKm-U4F8pwpRnF.woff
411 ms
K2FifZFYk-dHSE0UPPuwQ7CrD94i-NCKm-U4cMpwpRnF.woff
437 ms
K2FifZFYk-dHSE0UPPuwQ7CrD94i-NCKm-U4WcpwpRnF.woff
438 ms
modules.ttf
344 ms
hotjar-3355554.js
255 ms
sdk.js
191 ms
collect
183 ms
sdk.js
27 ms
feazer.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
feazer.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
feazer.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Feazer.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Feazer.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
feazer.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Feazer. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: