Tools & Wizards About Us
feedback.ae screenshot

Report Summary

  • 78

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 94

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

feedback.ae

Consumer product reviews and ratings companies in UAE: services in Dubai, Abu Dhabi and others cities

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

217 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

1 sec

feedback.ae screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Feedback content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about feedback.ae

Consumer product reviews and rating of the best companies in UAE. Popular services in Dubai, Abu Dhabi and other cities in United Arab Emirates. Addresses and phone numbers, videos and promotions in t...

Visit feedback.ae

Key Findings

We analyzed Feedback.ae page load time and found that the first response time was 217 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

feedback.ae performance score

78

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

49/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

48/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.9 s

83/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value30 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.2 s

74/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

feedback.ae

217 ms

740 ms

5263a172baf79f1bc293c2aafc7be714-1686048066

437 ms

css

33 ms

dbbf98f0dbdb6a89dc77dfd88b0f66ca-1686048066

243 ms

Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Feedback.ae, 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (740 ms) belongs to the original domain Feedback.ae.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 108.9 kB (53%)

Content Size

204.9 kB

After Optimization

96.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Feedback.ae main page is 204.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 99.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 87.0 kB

  • Original 99.2 kB
  • After minification 70.2 kB
  • After compression 12.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 28.9 kB, which is 29% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 87.0 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 19.8 kB

  • Original 33.0 kB
  • After minification 13.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Feedback needs image optimization as it can save up to 19.8 kB or 60% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

  • Original 71.5 kB
  • After minification 71.5 kB
  • After compression 69.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 19 B

  • Original 1.2 kB
  • After minification 1.2 kB
  • After compression 1.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Feedback.ae has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (12%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

30

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Feedback. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

feedback.ae

feedback.ae

217 ms

740 ms

5263a172baf79f1bc293c2aafc7be714-1686048066

5263a172baf79f1bc293c2aafc7be714-1686048066

437 ms

css

css

33 ms

dbbf98f0dbdb6a89dc77dfd88b0f66ca-1686048066

dbbf98f0dbdb6a89dc77dfd88b0f66ca-1686048066

243 ms

framework.js

framework.js

40 ms

framework.extras.js

framework.extras.js

42 ms

framework.extras.css

framework.extras.css

40 ms

script.js

script.js

47 ms

280 ms

no_photo.png

no_photo.png

46 ms

no_avatar.png

no_avatar.png

40 ms

ico-others.svg

ico-others.svg

40 ms

ico-animals.svg

ico-animals.svg

37 ms

ico-business.svg

ico-business.svg

42 ms

ico-building.svg

ico-building.svg

46 ms

ico-training.svg

ico-training.svg

49 ms

ico-technology.svg

ico-technology.svg

49 ms

ico-events.svg

ico-events.svg

46 ms

ico-drinks.svg

ico-drinks.svg

51 ms

ico-hobby.svg

ico-hobby.svg

129 ms

ico-legal.svg

ico-legal.svg

128 ms

ico-media.svg

ico-media.svg

125 ms

ico-local.svg

ico-local.svg

125 ms

ico-carrot.svg

ico-carrot.svg

132 ms

ico-shirt.svg

ico-shirt.svg

130 ms

ico-airplane.svg

ico-airplane.svg

131 ms

ico-car.svg

ico-car.svg

134 ms

ico-mirror.svg

ico-mirror.svg

134 ms

ico-home.svg

ico-home.svg

137 ms

ico-banks.svg

ico-banks.svg

135 ms

green-plus.svg

green-plus.svg

106 ms

red-minus.svg

red-minus.svg

107 ms

tab-plus.svg

tab-plus.svg

106 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

22 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

547 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

474 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

83 ms

font

font

84 ms

Accessibility Review

feedback.ae accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

feedback.ae best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

feedback.ae SEO score

94

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Feedback.ae can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Feedback.ae main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

feedback.ae

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Feedback. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: