Tools & Wizards About Us
feederr.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 84% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

feederr.com

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

191 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

794 ms

feederr.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to feederr.com homepage info - get ready to check Feederr best content right away, or after learning these important things about feederr.com

Traverse City Michigan web hosting website management and related internet services provider in Traverse City, Michigan

Visit feederr.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Feederr.com page load time and found that the first response time was 191 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

feederr.com performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

21/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.1 s

21/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value940 ms

30/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.077

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.3 s

32/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

feederr.com

191 ms

traverseweb.com

102 ms

bootstrap.css

462 ms

font-awesome.min.css

473 ms

css

27 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Feederr.com, 94% (29 requests) were made to Traverseweb.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (919 ms) relates to the external source Traverseweb.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 300.4 kB (14%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Feederr.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 10.2 kB

  • Original 13.6 kB
  • After minification 11.3 kB
  • After compression 3.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.3 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.2 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 65.2 kB

  • Original 1.8 MB
  • After minification 1.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Feederr images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 106.7 kB

  • Original 148.3 kB
  • After minification 129.7 kB
  • After compression 41.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 106.7 kB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 118.3 kB

  • Original 137.0 kB
  • After minification 108.3 kB
  • After compression 18.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Feederr.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 118.3 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

24

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Feederr. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

feederr.com

feederr.com

191 ms

traverseweb.com

traverseweb.com

102 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

462 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

473 ms

css

css

27 ms

landing-page.css

landing-page.css

58 ms

jquery-1.10.2.js

jquery-1.10.2.js

453 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

423 ms

jquery-1.10.2.min.js

jquery-1.10.2.min.js

875 ms

aboutparainfo.js

aboutparainfo.js

873 ms

lightbox.css

lightbox.css

885 ms

lightbox-2.6.min.js

lightbox-2.6.min.js

919 ms

new-small-logo.png

new-small-logo.png

59 ms

new-big-logo.png

new-big-logo.png

81 ms

web-logos.png

web-logos.png

160 ms

hands.jpg

hands.jpg

96 ms

standard-hosting.png

standard-hosting.png

141 ms

advanced-hosting.png

advanced-hosting.png

173 ms

rich-decor.jpg

rich-decor.jpg

182 ms

plm.jpg

plm.jpg

211 ms

preferred.jpg

preferred.jpg

223 ms

stormhawk.jpg

stormhawk.jpg

298 ms

daves-garage.jpg

daves-garage.jpg

316 ms

more.jpg

more.jpg

259 ms

contact-us.png

contact-us.png

237 ms

services-banner.png

services-banner.png

406 ms

first-section-bg2.jpg

first-section-bg2.jpg

187 ms

portfolio-bg.jpg

portfolio-bg.jpg

107 ms

hosting-bg.jpg

hosting-bg.jpg

161 ms

new-portfolio-bg.jpg

new-portfolio-bg.jpg

110 ms

services-background.jpg

services-background.jpg

134 ms

Accessibility Review

feederr.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

feederr.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

feederr.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Feederr.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Feederr.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

feederr.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Feederr. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: