2.5 sec in total
572 ms
1.4 sec
520 ms
Welcome to feedmag.com homepage info - get ready to check Feedmag best content right away, or after learning these important things about feedmag.com
스포츠 베팅을 쉽게 하는 방법을 찾으시나요? 그렇다면 지금 이 가이드를 주목해주세요. 온라인 스포츠 베팅을 하기 좋은 플랫폼을 소개하고 있습니다. 스포츠 도박 전문가들이 검토하고 실사용자 리뷰를 반영하여 최고의 사이트 10 곳을 선정하였습니다.
Visit feedmag.comWe analyzed Feedmag.com page load time and found that the first response time was 572 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
feedmag.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.1 s
3/100
10%
Value6.4 s
10/100
25%
Value10.9 s
6/100
10%
Value6,080 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value13.5 s
11/100
10%
572 ms
202 ms
189 ms
295 ms
359 ms
Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Feedmag.com, 9% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 9% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (572 ms) belongs to the original domain Feedmag.com.
Page size can be reduced by 69.4 kB (11%)
657.8 kB
588.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Feedmag.com main page is 657.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 508.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 67.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 67.0 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Feedmag images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 95 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 54 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Feedmag.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (52%)
29
14
The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Feedmag. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
feedmag.com
572 ms
js
202 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
189 ms
style.min.css
295 ms
styles.css
359 ms
lazyload-shared.css
380 ms
style.css
452 ms
js
123 ms
css2
376 ms
shortcodes.css
353 ms
index.js
353 ms
index.js
373 ms
lazyload-shared.js
377 ms
lazyload-youtube.js
373 ms
lazyload-vimeo.js
371 ms
app.min.js
371 ms
js
172 ms
analytics.js
136 ms
collect
13 ms
collect
69 ms
feedmag-300x215.png
195 ms
search-icon.png
59 ms
Automotive-Maintenance.jpg
60 ms
Car-Mechanic.jpg
358 ms
do-bmw-have-spare-tires.jpg
56 ms
can-you-put-a-spare-tire-on-the-front.jpg
20 ms
jizOREVItHgc8qDIbSTKq4XkRg8T88bjFuXOnduhLsWUBw.ttf
40 ms
jizOREVItHgc8qDIbSTKq4XkRg8T88bjFuXOnduhrsKUBw.ttf
82 ms
ieVl2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-59U.ttf
83 ms
what-connects-the-tire-to-the-car.jpg
180 ms
Why-Does-My-Car-Slow-Down-Then-Speed-Up.jpg
23 ms
Why-Does-My-Car-Sound-Like-an-Airplane.jpg
63 ms
Do-Manual-Cars-Have-Cruise-Control.jpg
154 ms
feedmag.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
feedmag.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
feedmag.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Feedmag.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Feedmag.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
feedmag.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Feedmag. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: