Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

feedmag.com

온라인 토토사이트 추천 목록  - 스포츠 베팅 시작하는 법

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

572 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

520 ms

feedmag.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to feedmag.com homepage info - get ready to check Feedmag best content right away, or after learning these important things about feedmag.com

스포츠 베팅을 쉽게 하는 방법을 찾으시나요? 그렇다면 지금 이 가이드를 주목해주세요. 온라인 스포츠 베팅을 하기 좋은 플랫폼을 소개하고 있습니다. 스포츠 도박 전문가들이 검토하고 실사용자 리뷰를 반영하여 최고의 사이트 10 곳을 선정하였습니다.

Visit feedmag.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Feedmag.com page load time and found that the first response time was 572 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

feedmag.com performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

10/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.9 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value6,080 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.5 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

feedmag.com

572 ms

js

202 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

189 ms

style.min.css

295 ms

styles.css

359 ms

Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Feedmag.com, 9% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 9% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (572 ms) belongs to the original domain Feedmag.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 69.4 kB (11%)

Content Size

657.8 kB

After Optimization

588.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Feedmag.com main page is 657.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 508.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 67.0 kB

  • Original 91.4 kB
  • After minification 91.4 kB
  • After compression 24.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 67.0 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.2 kB

  • Original 508.3 kB
  • After minification 506.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Feedmag images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 95 B

  • Original 28.8 kB
  • After minification 28.8 kB
  • After compression 28.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 54 B

  • Original 29.2 kB
  • After minification 29.2 kB
  • After compression 29.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Feedmag.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (52%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

14

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Feedmag. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

feedmag.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

feedmag.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

feedmag.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Feedmag.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Feedmag.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Feedmag. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: