Tools & Wizards About Us
femalecharming.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 13

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 35% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

femalecharming.com

Page Load Speed

5.6 sec in total

First Response

909 ms

Resources Loaded

3.9 sec

Page Rendered

834 ms

femalecharming.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Femalecharming content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about femalecharming.com

Fashion accessories always play an important role in our dressing-up and personal impression that we can never ignore. It can be said that they have the same significance as fashion clothing. This blo...

Visit femalecharming.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Femalecharming.com page load time and found that the first response time was 909 ms and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

femalecharming.com performance score

13

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.5 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value12,290 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.131

81/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value26.2 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.femalecharming.com

909 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

66 ms

style.min.css

169 ms

sfsi-style.css

244 ms

style.css

396 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Femalecharming.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Assets.pinterest.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (927 ms) belongs to the original domain Femalecharming.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 265.4 kB (33%)

Content Size

808.7 kB

After Optimization

543.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Femalecharming.com main page is 808.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 317.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 56.8 kB

  • Original 71.1 kB
  • After minification 68.2 kB
  • After compression 14.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.8 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 9.1 kB

  • Original 257.0 kB
  • After minification 247.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Femalecharming images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 56.0 kB

  • Original 317.5 kB
  • After minification 312.4 kB
  • After compression 261.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 56.0 kB or 18% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 143.5 kB

  • Original 163.0 kB
  • After minification 125.1 kB
  • After compression 19.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Femalecharming.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 143.5 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (51%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

20

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Femalecharming. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.femalecharming.com

www.femalecharming.com

909 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

66 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

169 ms

sfsi-style.css

sfsi-style.css

244 ms

style.css

style.css

396 ms

css

css

30 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

228 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

129 ms

modernizr.min.js

modernizr.min.js

159 ms

customscript.js

customscript.js

200 ms

in.js

in.js

24 ms

pinit.js

pinit.js

41 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

235 ms

modernizr.custom.min.js

modernizr.custom.min.js

217 ms

jquery.shuffle.min.js

jquery.shuffle.min.js

260 ms

random-shuffle-min.js

random-shuffle-min.js

281 ms

custom.js

custom.js

300 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

300 ms

pngk.png

pngk.png

468 ms

www.femalecharming.com

www.femalecharming.com

927 ms

nothumb.png

nothumb.png

245 ms

views-icon.png

views-icon.png

240 ms

search_image.png

search_image.png

239 ms

BG-%E9%A2%86%E5%88%B8%E4%B8%AD%E5%BF%83-960x200-zhengqiaorong-126.jpg

BG-%E9%A2%86%E5%88%B8%E4%B8%AD%E5%BF%83-960x200-zhengqiaorong-126.jpg

367 ms

shoes-107401_640.jpg

shoes-107401_640.jpg

366 ms

default_rss.png

default_rss.png

224 ms

default_email.png

default_email.png

264 ms

default_facebook.png

default_facebook.png

263 ms

bot_tip_icn.png

bot_tip_icn.png

264 ms

default_twitter.png

default_twitter.png

264 ms

default_youtube.png

default_youtube.png

264 ms

default_pinterest.png

default_pinterest.png

265 ms

default_linkedin.png

default_linkedin.png

296 ms

default_instagram.png

default_instagram.png

297 ms

default_google.png

default_google.png

299 ms

6aez4K2oVqwIvtU2Gg.ttf

6aez4K2oVqwIvtU2Gg.ttf

47 ms

6ae84K2oVqwItm4TCpAy3w.ttf

6ae84K2oVqwItm4TCpAy3w.ttf

48 ms

top_arrow.png

top_arrow.png

432 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

335 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

427 ms

platform.js

platform.js

429 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

372 ms

pinit_main.js

pinit_main.js

314 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

102 ms

Accessibility Review

femalecharming.com accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

femalecharming.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

femalecharming.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Femalecharming.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Femalecharming.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

femalecharming.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Femalecharming. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: