7.6 sec in total
334 ms
5.6 sec
1.7 sec
Visit fena.es now to see the best up-to-date F En A content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about fena.es
Aparece en cientos de periódicos digitales aumentando tu posicionamiento web. ✔️ Aumentar la credibilidad y visibilidad de un negocio
Visit fena.esWe analyzed Fena.es page load time and found that the first response time was 334 ms and then it took 7.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
fena.es performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
23/100
10%
Value4.4 s
39/100
25%
Value8.4 s
18/100
10%
Value4,260 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.04
99/100
15%
Value16.2 s
6/100
10%
334 ms
432 ms
165 ms
240 ms
381 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Fena.es, 89% (70 requests) were made to Setroi.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fast.wistia.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) relates to the external source Setroi.com.
Page size can be reduced by 150.1 kB (11%)
1.4 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Fena.es main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 977.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 112.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 112.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 37.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. F En A images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 424 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (58%)
59
25
The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of F En A. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
fena.es
334 ms
fena.es
432 ms
www.setroi.com
165 ms
autoptimize_f4545fdee11f8d291fa433f284806ec2.php
240 ms
autoptimize_single_c145962924bd253cbdf01e580dbeb10a.php
381 ms
autoptimize_single_1131cfc4316a290ea5410f814654048b.php
383 ms
autoptimize_single_f9464897c6b020ad33a441205551c951.php
717 ms
autoptimize_single_f88728af8d3ad9bdd7ade8c841431623.php
2768 ms
autoptimize_single_04f32eb19661ac029d1200a85481da6a.php
335 ms
conditionizr-4.3.0.min.js
503 ms
modernizr-2.7.1.min.js
642 ms
jquery.min.js
627 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
643 ms
scripts.js
822 ms
cookie-law-info-public.js
932 ms
js
70 ms
eyqf3noylx.jsonp
44 ms
E-v1.js
68 ms
email-decode.min.js
647 ms
autoptimize_single_2da9b52e10fa3e788a2196249a80a6d5.php
751 ms
autoptimize_single_cc920af9a3b9df9635b60380e2020d64.php
768 ms
wp-embed.min.js
962 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
1072 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
1064 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
1118 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
1233 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
1282 ms
frontend.min.js
1370 ms
waypoints.min.js
1366 ms
core.min.js
1526 ms
swiper.min.js
1546 ms
share-link.min.js
1583 ms
dialog.min.js
1657 ms
frontend.min.js
1667 ms
preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js
2136 ms
preloaded-modules.min.js
1848 ms
v652eace1692a40cfa3763df669d7439c1639079717194
104 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
1576 ms
swatch
26 ms
logosetroi-1.svg
309 ms
SETROI_XabiPrieto_Miniatura.jpg
362 ms
SETROI_PlanDefinitivo-3.jpg
362 ms
que.png
409 ms
elmundofinanciero.png
359 ms
ecd-1.png
362 ms
moncloa.png
442 ms
diariofinanciero.png
616 ms
elboletin.png
638 ms
periodista-digital.png
607 ms
estrella-digital.png
691 ms
madridiario.png
904 ms
logos-buscadores-2.png
810 ms
tablet-1-700x305.jpg
901 ms
App-SETROI-2.png
742 ms
app-store.png
1036 ms
google-play.png
1037 ms
Setroi-Equipo-01.png
863 ms
v2logosetroi.svg
822 ms
logos-payments-1.svg
940 ms
Gilroy-Medium.woff
1249 ms
Gilroy-SemiBold.woff
1354 ms
Gilroy-Bold.woff
1352 ms
Gilroy-ExtraBold.woff
1354 ms
Gilroy-Regular.woff
1354 ms
Gilroy-Light.woff
1576 ms
App-SETROI.png
1452 ms
icomoon.ttf
1400 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1398 ms
k3k6o8UDI-1M0wlSV9XAw6lQkqWY8Q82sJaRE-NWIDdgffTT0zRZ9xds.ttf
1080 ms
k3k6o8UDI-1M0wlSV9XAw6lQkqWY8Q82sJaRE-NWIDdgffTTtDRZ9xds.ttf
1305 ms
k3k6o8UDI-1M0wlSV9XAw6lQkqWY8Q82sJaRE-NWIDdgffTTnTRZ9xds.ttf
1301 ms
k3k6o8UDI-1M0wlSV9XAw6lQkqWY8Q82sJaRE-NWIDdgffTT6jRZ9xds.ttf
1306 ms
k3k6o8UDI-1M0wlSV9XAw6lQkqWY8Q82sJaRE-NWIDdgffTTBjNZ9xds.ttf
1305 ms
k3k6o8UDI-1M0wlSV9XAw6lQkqWY8Q82sJaRE-NWIDdgffTTNDNZ9xds.ttf
1307 ms
k3k6o8UDI-1M0wlSV9XAw6lQkqWY8Q82sJaRE-NWIDdgffTTajNZ9xds.ttf
1306 ms
k3k6o8UDI-1M0wlSV9XAw6lQkqWY8Q82sJaRE-NWIDdgffTTtDNZ9xds.ttf
1251 ms
k3k6o8UDI-1M0wlSV9XAw6lQkqWY8Q82sJaRE-NWIDdgffTTNDJZ9xds.ttf
1335 ms
iframe_shim
185 ms
mux.js
188 ms
fena.es accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
fena.es best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
fena.es SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
ES
ES
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fena.es can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fena.es main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
fena.es
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of F En A. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: