Report Summary

  • 55

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

ffonts.net

150,000+ Free Fonts | Download Now - FFonts

Page Load Speed

54.3 sec in total

First Response

392 ms

Resources Loaded

31.6 sec

Page Rendered

22.3 sec

ffonts.net screenshot

About Website

Visit ffonts.net now to see the best up-to-date FFonts content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ffonts.net

Looking to download stylish fonts for free? Discover FFonts.net`s library of over 100,000+ fonts for personal use. ✔

Visit ffonts.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Ffonts.net page load time and found that the first response time was 392 ms and then it took 53.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ffonts.net performance score

55

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

50/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

78/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.1 s

93/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,630 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.5 s

23/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ffonts.net

392 ms

ffonts.net

844 ms

www.ffonts.net

1520 ms

gpt.js

1396 ms

logo.svg

3605 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Ffonts.net, 33% (21 requests) were made to D144mzi0q5mijx.cloudfront.net and 13% (8 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (10.6 sec) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (55%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

983.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Ffonts.net main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 66.4 kB

  • Original 89.3 kB
  • After minification 86.5 kB
  • After compression 22.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.4 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 30.7 kB

  • Original 327.2 kB
  • After minification 296.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. FFonts images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 1.1 MB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB
  • After compression 656.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 62% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 28.4 kB

  • Original 36.6 kB
  • After minification 32.6 kB
  • After compression 8.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ffonts.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 28.4 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (43%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

32

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of FFonts. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

ffonts.net accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

ffonts.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

ffonts.net SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ffonts.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ffonts.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of FFonts. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: