Tools & Wizards About Us
fiberpipe.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

fiberpipe.in

ISP in Ahmedabad | Leased Line, VOIP, Call Center Solution

Page Load Speed

12.9 sec in total

First Response

1.1 sec

Resources Loaded

11.1 sec

Page Rendered

737 ms

fiberpipe.in screenshot

About Website

Visit fiberpipe.in now to see the best up-to-date Fiberpipe content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about fiberpipe.in

Get a complete range of IP communications services like Internet Service (ISP), Leased line, VoIP service, etc in Ahmedabad. Call Today: +91 7048404000.

Visit fiberpipe.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Fiberpipe.in page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 11.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

fiberpipe.in performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

13/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.9 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value28.3 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value530 ms

55/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.173

69/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.2 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

fiberpipe.in

1108 ms

www.fiberpipe.in

1429 ms

custom-bootstrap.css

491 ms

bootstrap.min.css

1216 ms

animate.min.css

1548 ms

Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Fiberpipe.in, 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Fiberpipe.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 881.4 kB (15%)

Content Size

6.0 MB

After Optimization

5.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Fiberpipe.in main page is 6.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 52.6 kB

  • Original 58.8 kB
  • After minification 34.3 kB
  • After compression 6.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 24.5 kB, which is 42% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 52.6 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 73.3 kB

  • Original 5.0 MB
  • After minification 4.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fiberpipe images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 299.8 kB

  • Original 418.1 kB
  • After minification 384.8 kB
  • After compression 118.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 299.8 kB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 455.7 kB

  • Original 532.6 kB
  • After minification 468.8 kB
  • After compression 76.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fiberpipe.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 455.7 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (53%)

Requests Now

58

After Optimization

27

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fiberpipe. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

fiberpipe.in

fiberpipe.in

1108 ms

www.fiberpipe.in

www.fiberpipe.in

1429 ms

custom-bootstrap.css

custom-bootstrap.css

491 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

1216 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

1548 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

903 ms

fontawesome-all.min.css

fontawesome-all.min.css

1394 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

952 ms

jquery.flipster.css

jquery.flipster.css

1059 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

1144 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

1189 ms

odometer.css

odometer.css

1333 ms

slick.css

slick.css

1368 ms

default.css

default.css

1431 ms

style.css

style.css

1525 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

1593 ms

modal.css

modal.css

1606 ms

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

2104 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1709 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

1554 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

1787 ms

jquery.odometer.min.js

jquery.odometer.min.js

1632 ms

jquery.appear.js

jquery.appear.js

1611 ms

jquery.flipster.min.js

jquery.flipster.min.js

1824 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

2062 ms

jarallax.min.js

jarallax.min.js

2131 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

1982 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

2009 ms

main.js

main.js

2062 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

2239 ms

js.js

js.js

2231 ms

index.js

index.js

2314 ms

custom.js

custom.js

2287 ms

css2

css2

31 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

110 ms

preloader.gif

preloader.gif

1428 ms

Logo-Colour.png

Logo-Colour.png

1007 ms

captcha.php

captcha.php

1066 ms

Banner-1.jpg

Banner-1.jpg

1801 ms

Banner-2.jpg

Banner-2.jpg

7163 ms

Banner-3.jpg

Banner-3.jpg

1905 ms

Banner-4.jpg

Banner-4.jpg

2301 ms

About-Us.jpg

About-Us.jpg

2630 ms

Our-Services-1.jpg

Our-Services-1.jpg

2117 ms

global-map.png

global-map.png

2069 ms

Industries-We-Serve-1.jpg

Industries-We-Serve-1.jpg

2163 ms

Industries-We-Serve-2.jpg

Industries-We-Serve-2.jpg

2310 ms

Industries-We-Serve-3.jpg

Industries-We-Serve-3.jpg

2831 ms

Industries-We-Serve-4.jpg

Industries-We-Serve-4.jpg

2419 ms

Industries-We-Serve-5.jpg

Industries-We-Serve-5.jpg

2582 ms

Industries-We-Serve-6.jpg

Industries-We-Serve-6.jpg

2578 ms

Website-Documents.jpg

Website-Documents.jpg

2660 ms

checkmark-filled_red.png

checkmark-filled_red.png

2835 ms

Client%20Logo-1.jpg

Client%20Logo-1.jpg

2849 ms

Client%20Logo-2.jpg

Client%20Logo-2.jpg

2825 ms

flaticon7473.ttf

flaticon7473.ttf

2762 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

3356 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

2858 ms

fa-light-300.woff

fa-light-300.woff

2825 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

3590 ms

Client%20Logo-3.jpg

Client%20Logo-3.jpg

2753 ms

Client%20Logo-4.jpg

Client%20Logo-4.jpg

2776 ms

Client%20Logo-5.jpg

Client%20Logo-5.jpg

2803 ms

subscribe_bg.jpg

subscribe_bg.jpg

2628 ms

cta_bg.jpg

cta_bg.jpg

2855 ms

Accessibility Review

fiberpipe.in accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

fiberpipe.in best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

fiberpipe.in SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fiberpipe.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fiberpipe.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

fiberpipe.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Fiberpipe. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: