Tools & Wizards About Us
fidelitycomputing.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 86

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    89% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

fidelitycomputing.com

Computer Repair | Computer Networking Service San Fernando Valley

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

450 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

82 ms

fidelitycomputing.com screenshot

About Website

Visit fidelitycomputing.com now to see the best up-to-date Fidelitycomputing content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about fidelitycomputing.com

Welcome to Fidelity Computing & Communications! We are the San Fernando Valley's premier provider of Computers: Sales, Repair & Networking services.

Visit fidelitycomputing.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Fidelitycomputing.com page load time and found that the first response time was 450 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

fidelitycomputing.com performance score

86

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

68/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

75/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.7 s

86/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value50 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.126

83/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.7 s

97/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

450 ms

widgetkit-bfe82b23.css

38 ms

mootools-core.js

107 ms

core.js

82 ms

caption.js

81 ms

Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Fidelitycomputing.com, 30% (22 requests) were made to Fccsf.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (450 ms) belongs to the original domain Fidelitycomputing.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 30.0 kB (12%)

Content Size

258.0 kB

After Optimization

228.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Fidelitycomputing.com main page is 258.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 116.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 12.3 kB

  • Original 16.9 kB
  • After minification 16.1 kB
  • After compression 4.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.3 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 8.8 kB

  • Original 98.8 kB
  • After minification 90.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fidelitycomputing images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

  • Original 116.2 kB
  • After minification 116.2 kB
  • After compression 114.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 6.9 kB

  • Original 26.1 kB
  • After minification 25.7 kB
  • After compression 19.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fidelitycomputing.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.9 kB or 26% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (58%)

Requests Now

71

After Optimization

30

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fidelitycomputing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

450 ms

widgetkit-bfe82b23.css

widgetkit-bfe82b23.css

38 ms

mootools-core.js

mootools-core.js

107 ms

core.js

core.js

82 ms

caption.js

caption.js

81 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

120 ms

widgetkit-444da941.js

widgetkit-444da941.js

82 ms

base.css

base.css

83 ms

layout.css

layout.css

132 ms

menus.css

menus.css

130 ms

modules.css

modules.css

133 ms

tools.css

tools.css

132 ms

system.css

system.css

141 ms

extensions.css

extensions.css

144 ms

custom.css

custom.css

142 ms

bubbles_blue.css

bubbles_blue.css

142 ms

animations.css

animations.css

147 ms

blue.css

blue.css

148 ms

bebas.css

bebas.css

177 ms

bebas.css

bebas.css

176 ms

style.css

style.css

179 ms

print.css

print.css

180 ms

bebas.css

bebas.css

182 ms

warp.js

warp.js

182 ms

accordionmenu.js

accordionmenu.js

211 ms

dropdownmenu.js

dropdownmenu.js

210 ms

template.js

template.js

211 ms

search.js

search.js

212 ms

lightbox.js

lightbox.js

95 ms

mediaelement-and-player.js

mediaelement-and-player.js

114 ms

base.css

base.css

120 ms

menus.css

menus.css

120 ms

layout.css

layout.css

117 ms

tools.css

tools.css

119 ms

modules.css

modules.css

122 ms

system.css

system.css

135 ms

system.css

system.css

136 ms

system-all.css

system-all.css

133 ms

print.css

print.css

95 ms

prum.min.js

prum.min.js

39 ms

Acer_logo.png

Acer_logo.png

148 ms

toolbar_bg.png

toolbar_bg.png

48 ms

searchbox.png

searchbox.png

47 ms

digium_logo.png

digium_logo.png

145 ms

Acronis_logo.png

Acronis_logo.png

144 ms

Antec_logo.png

Antec_logo.png

146 ms

APC_logo.png

APC_logo.png

147 ms

Apple_logo.png

Apple_logo.png

147 ms

Cisco_logo.png

Cisco_logo.png

175 ms

Dell_logo.png

Dell_logo.png

174 ms

D-Link_logo.png

D-Link_logo.png

175 ms

HP_logo.png

HP_logo.png

176 ms

Intel_logo.png

Intel_logo.png

174 ms

Maxtor_logo.png

Maxtor_logo.png

176 ms

Microsoft_logo.png

Microsoft_logo.png

206 ms

Netgear_logo.png

Netgear_logo.png

206 ms

Panasonic_logo.png

Panasonic_logo.png

205 ms

Pioneer_logo.png

Pioneer_logo.png

206 ms

Seagate_logo.png

Seagate_logo.png

207 ms

Sonos_logo.png

Sonos_logo.png

212 ms

Toshiba_logo.png

Toshiba_logo.png

237 ms

Trend+Micro_logo.png

Trend+Micro_logo.png

238 ms

icon_Facebook.png

icon_Facebook.png

242 ms

icon_Yelp.png

icon_Yelp.png

235 ms

icons_social.png

icons_social.png

41 ms

menu_line_item.png

menu_line_item.png

41 ms

logo.png

logo.png

63 ms

menu_dropdown_level1.png

menu_dropdown_level1.png

41 ms

totop_scroller.png

totop_scroller.png

54 ms

menu_line_item_footer.png

menu_line_item_footer.png

53 ms

BebasNeue-webfont.woff

BebasNeue-webfont.woff

53 ms

ga.js

ga.js

22 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

11 ms

Accessibility Review

fidelitycomputing.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

fidelitycomputing.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

fidelitycomputing.com SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fidelitycomputing.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fidelitycomputing.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

fidelitycomputing.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Fidelitycomputing. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: