Tools & Wizards About Us
fieldcode.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 32

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    52% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

fieldcode.com

Smart field service management that meets your enterprise needs

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

146 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

fieldcode.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to fieldcode.com homepage info - get ready to check Field Code best content for Greece right away, or after learning these important things about fieldcode.com

Elevate your tech enterprise's service management with intelligent software. Streamline planning, forecasting, and network management for supreme efficiency.

Visit fieldcode.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Fieldcode.com page load time and found that the first response time was 146 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

fieldcode.com performance score

32

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

83/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.4 s

40/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value660 ms

45/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.352

31/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.3 s

19/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

fieldcode.com

146 ms

fieldcode.com

812 ms

gtm.js

148 ms

modernizr-custom.js

137 ms

fieldcode.main.css

154 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Fieldcode.com, 8% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Code.tidio.co. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (812 ms) belongs to the original domain Fieldcode.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 249.2 kB (40%)

Content Size

630.4 kB

After Optimization

381.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Fieldcode.com main page is 630.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 207.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 177.3 kB

  • Original 207.5 kB
  • After minification 196.4 kB
  • After compression 30.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 177.3 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 71.4 kB

  • Original 202.1 kB
  • After minification 130.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Field Code needs image optimization as it can save up to 71.4 kB or 35% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 494 B

  • Original 207.0 kB
  • After minification 207.0 kB
  • After compression 206.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 81 B

  • Original 13.7 kB
  • After minification 13.7 kB
  • After compression 13.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fieldcode.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (41%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

20

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Field Code. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

fieldcode.com

fieldcode.com

146 ms

fieldcode.com

fieldcode.com

812 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

148 ms

modernizr-custom.js

modernizr-custom.js

137 ms

fieldcode.main.css

fieldcode.main.css

154 ms

js

js

43 ms

targeting.js

targeting.js

230 ms

runtime.bundle.js

runtime.bundle.js

231 ms

vendors.bundle.js

vendors.bundle.js

372 ms

clickableMenu.js

clickableMenu.js

232 ms

lottie.5.10.0.min.js

lottie.5.10.0.min.js

376 ms

sharer.0.5.1.min.js

sharer.0.5.1.min.js

231 ms

flickity.pkgd.min.js

flickity.pkgd.min.js

305 ms

flickity-fade.min.js

flickity-fade.min.js

299 ms

main.bundle.js

main.bundle.js

373 ms

pwo3u2uaf8zjsoglxjebsiabre3ocpxi.js

pwo3u2uaf8zjsoglxjebsiabre3ocpxi.js

127 ms

render.f24b3cc3bae18cf3ec7e.js

render.f24b3cc3bae18cf3ec7e.js

114 ms

js

js

118 ms

fc_gartner_teaser_home_big.png

fc_gartner_teaser_home_big.png

190 ms

accenture.png

accenture.png

258 ms

gea.png

gea.png

226 ms

hemmersbach.png

hemmersbach.png

261 ms

hermes.png

hermes.png

266 ms

hpe.png

hpe.png

265 ms

hp.png

hp.png

266 ms

ibm.png

ibm.png

268 ms

infosys.png

infosys.png

328 ms

kapsch.png

kapsch.png

330 ms

life-fitness.png

life-fitness.png

331 ms

sigfox.png

sigfox.png

334 ms

swisslog.png

swisslog.png

334 ms

fc_home_whyus_iot.svg

fc_home_whyus_iot.svg

338 ms

fc_teaser_home_pricing_dollar.svg

fc_teaser_home_pricing_dollar.svg

397 ms

fc_teaser_home_co2.svg

fc_teaser_home_co2.svg

399 ms

google-play-badge.png

google-play-badge.png

401 ms

appstore-ios.svg

appstore-ios.svg

404 ms

OtAutoBlock.js

OtAutoBlock.js

37 ms

Accessibility Review

fieldcode.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

fieldcode.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

fieldcode.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fieldcode.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fieldcode.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

fieldcode.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Field Code. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: