Tools & Wizards About Us
fifengineering.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 91% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

fifengineering.com

Engineering Company | Austin, TX | 832-341-9726

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

29 ms

Resources Loaded

427 ms

Page Rendered

711 ms

fifengineering.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to fifengineering.com homepage info - get ready to check Fif Engineering best content right away, or after learning these important things about fifengineering.com

FIF Engineering is an Austin, TX - based engineering company, providing an experienced and professional service across Texas. Join our happy clients today.

Visit fifengineering.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Fifengineering.com page load time and found that the first response time was 29 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

fifengineering.com performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

95/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

10/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.2 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value660 ms

45/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.391

26/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.9 s

35/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

fifengineering.com

29 ms

www.fifengineering.com

94 ms

logostretched-179w.png

171 ms

jquery-3.7.0.min.js

54 ms

d-js-one-runtime-unified-desktop.min.js

66 ms

Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 10% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Fifengineering.com, 40% (8 requests) were made to Lirp.cdn-website.com and 20% (4 requests) were made to Static.cdn-website.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (273 ms) relates to the external source Lirp.cdn-website.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 137.9 kB (35%)

Content Size

392.3 kB

After Optimization

254.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Fifengineering.com main page is 392.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 170.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 131.0 kB

  • Original 170.3 kB
  • After minification 166.0 kB
  • After compression 39.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 131.0 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 6.3 kB

  • Original 56.5 kB
  • After minification 50.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Fif Engineering needs image optimization as it can save up to 6.3 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 456 B

  • Original 165.6 kB
  • After minification 165.6 kB
  • After compression 165.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (41%)

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fif Engineering. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

fifengineering.com

fifengineering.com

29 ms

www.fifengineering.com

www.fifengineering.com

94 ms

logostretched-179w.png

logostretched-179w.png

171 ms

jquery-3.7.0.min.js

jquery-3.7.0.min.js

54 ms

d-js-one-runtime-unified-desktop.min.js

d-js-one-runtime-unified-desktop.min.js

66 ms

d-js-jquery-migrate.min.js

d-js-jquery-migrate.min.js

65 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

101 ms

js

js

198 ms

FIFEngineering+%287%29-1920w.jpg

FIFEngineering+%287%29-1920w.jpg

197 ms

s3+%2811%29-1920w.jpg

s3+%2811%29-1920w.jpg

196 ms

experience-logo-92w.png

experience-logo-92w.png

94 ms

insured-bond-logo-93h.png

insured-bond-logo-93h.png

95 ms

home-adviser-logo-97w.png

home-adviser-logo-97w.png

130 ms

t-1523w.png

t-1523w.png

273 ms

logostretched-171w.png

logostretched-171w.png

198 ms

84 ms

loader.js

loader.js

81 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

7 ms

33 ms

call-tracking_7.js

call-tracking_7.js

12 ms

Accessibility Review

fifengineering.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

fifengineering.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

fifengineering.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fifengineering.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fifengineering.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

fifengineering.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Fif Engineering. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: