Tools & Wizards About Us
filecloud.to screenshot

Report Summary

  • 39

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    59% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

filecloud.to

filecloud.to

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

724 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

423 ms

filecloud.to screenshot

About Website

Welcome to filecloud.to homepage info - get ready to check Filecloud best content for Pakistan right away, or after learning these important things about filecloud.to

The domain name 'filecloud.to' is parked at Register.TO Domain Registrar.

Visit filecloud.to

Key Findings

We analyzed Filecloud.to page load time and found that the first response time was 724 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

filecloud.to performance score

39

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

19/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

21/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.1 s

45/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value830 ms

35/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.197

62/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.1 s

76/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

filecloud.to

724 ms

jquery-1.9.1.min.js

96 ms

bootstrap.css

88 ms

bootstrap.min.js

203 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

309 ms

Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Filecloud.to, 14% (3 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com and 10% (2 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (724 ms) belongs to the original domain Filecloud.to.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 224.8 kB (69%)

Content Size

326.0 kB

After Optimization

101.1 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Filecloud.to main page is 326.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 196.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 8.0 kB

  • Original 11.0 kB
  • After minification 11.0 kB
  • After compression 3.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.0 kB or 72% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-55%

Potential reduce by 64.9 kB

  • Original 118.3 kB
  • After minification 118.2 kB
  • After compression 53.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 64.9 kB or 55% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 152.0 kB

  • Original 196.7 kB
  • After minification 196.4 kB
  • After compression 44.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Filecloud.to needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 152.0 kB or 77% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (53%)

Requests Now

19

After Optimization

9

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Filecloud. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

filecloud.to

filecloud.to

724 ms

jquery-1.9.1.min.js

jquery-1.9.1.min.js

96 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

88 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

203 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

bootstrap-theme.min.css

309 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

364 ms

all.css

all.css

332 ms

v4-shims.css

v4-shims.css

337 ms

style.css

style.css

35 ms

jquery.paging.js

jquery.paging.js

36 ms

jquery.cookie.js

jquery.cookie.js

85 ms

paging.js

paging.js

200 ms

ga.js

ga.js

231 ms

logo_lgrey.png

logo_lgrey.png

208 ms

ico_fb.png

ico_fb.png

206 ms

ico_tr.png

ico_tr.png

208 ms

ico_gp.png

ico_gp.png

219 ms

logo-grey.png

logo-grey.png

78 ms

flags.png

flags.png

91 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

26 ms

OpenSans-Regular.woff

OpenSans-Regular.woff

22 ms

Accessibility Review

filecloud.to accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

filecloud.to best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

filecloud.to SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Filecloud.to can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Filecloud.to main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

filecloud.to

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Filecloud. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: