2.8 sec in total
32 ms
2.7 sec
57 ms
Click here to check amazing Fileheads content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about fileheads.net
Judith Kolberg ia an exciting Thought Leader in the organizing industry with the knowledge and understanding to educate, and to forecast trends. An innovative Book Coack who can turn your knowledge an...
Visit fileheads.netWe analyzed Fileheads.net page load time and found that the first response time was 32 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
fileheads.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
75/100
10%
Value6.7 s
7/100
25%
Value2.3 s
99/100
10%
Value490 ms
58/100
30%
Value0.032
100/100
15%
Value10.1 s
26/100
10%
32 ms
1131 ms
20 ms
52 ms
53 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Fileheads.net, 52% (41 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 27% (21 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 863.2 kB (55%)
1.6 MB
717.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Fileheads.net main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 913.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 733.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 733.5 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 81.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Fileheads needs image optimization as it can save up to 81.6 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 48.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 48.1 kB or 17% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (18%)
55
45
The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fileheads. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
fileheads.net
32 ms
www.judithkolberg.com
1131 ms
minified.js
20 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
52 ms
polyfill.min.js
53 ms
JK-logo-1000px.jpg
312 ms
8b3e05_92496affaa0f42a78149f08653525d0d~mv2.jpg
263 ms
Judith-Silo.png
321 ms
the_consequences_of_clutter.jpg
353 ms
Screenshot%202024-07-01%20at%2012_30_47%E2%80%AFPM.png
271 ms
GettyImages-968062554-2048x1365.jpeg
261 ms
1687950723488.jpeg
443 ms
Ellen%20Delap.jpg
419 ms
Judith-Podcast-image.jpeg
464 ms
Jordan%20McMahon.jpg
533 ms
maxsold%20logo.jpg
486 ms
IBPA-0722-Article-Image.jpg
592 ms
COVER%20w_CPO%205_24_21.jpg
579 ms
judith_atlanta_2-225x300.jpeg
609 ms
judith_atlanta_800px-239x300.jpeg
752 ms
Netherlands-2013.jpg
694 ms
Anything-But-Idle-Podcast-Logo-Assets-an.jpg
723 ms
DEP_Book-3.png
792 ms
8b3e05_e1ad0169bf22462182b3b71a26b7659d~mv2.jpg
773 ms
8b3e05_6ea02a583436466eb9201b7b3b188c97~mv2.jpg
809 ms
8b3e05_b2c34291e1a9428a9a6862f1c4a12867~mv2.jpg
918 ms
8b3e05_e36f34e2836b4e6cb7956e5d938ff861~mv2.jpg
942 ms
8b3e05_62fd80eb5c484f498965bc5a1d9f2cf7~mv2.jpg
966 ms
8b3e05_0045c20c91604bd88ca02cecccadaf3d~mv2.jpg
977 ms
8b3e05_77d8c4b75cf241bbb1db802740a97f19~mv2.jpg
937 ms
8b3e05_6ed0407ca8e34a178e88a56a76c11edc~mv2.jpg
1016 ms
8b3e05_0d618955fb304806845479e010db942e~mv2.jpg
1098 ms
8b3e05_90fddd27da0e4a4abd0fa56e83c0ac3a~mv2.png
1128 ms
8b3e05_62a547b52b1a4d9086f3170c284379ef~mv2.jpg
1179 ms
8b3e05_7a1bc8c21e5843dfb348be3984e7ca03~mv2.jpg
1147 ms
8b3e05_a9140a1164d247ebb0a14526c2945e95~mv2.jpg
1149 ms
8b3e05_19eb1312b69c4aaf976e7fd4765d459e~mv2.jpg
1220 ms
8b3e05_87eeed1ce32a4fc3bd60d646014904df~mv2.png
1289 ms
8b3e05_356512e37e494284ba0c932e7b851703~mv2.jpg
1326 ms
8b3e05_2716be009d9d40d29689cc9e9694ae30~mv2.jpg
1378 ms
8b3e05_9f39608604134687b3cb50c95263eceb~mv2.jpg
1308 ms
bundle.min.js
54 ms
thunderbolt-commons.60ed9a5a.bundle.min.js
39 ms
main.dda15fae.bundle.min.js
42 ms
main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js
42 ms
lodash.min.js
83 ms
react.production.min.js
83 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
87 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
57 ms
174 ms
174 ms
166 ms
163 ms
165 ms
164 ms
198 ms
199 ms
199 ms
192 ms
182 ms
175 ms
03805817-4611-4dbc-8c65-0f73031c3973.woff
7 ms
c5749443-93da-4592-b794-42f28d62ef72.woff
17 ms
192dac76-a6d9-413d-bb74-22308f2e0cc5.woff
18 ms
0a3939d0-3833-4db3-8b85-f64c2b3350d2.woff
18 ms
80c34ad2-27c2-4d99-90fa-985fd64ab81a.woff
18 ms
908c4810-64db-4b46-bb8e-823eb41f68c0.woff
16 ms
file.woff
925 ms
8b3e05_3dcb6e01427946369f4887306bf544c6~mv2.jpg
1094 ms
8b3e05_4cd2afb8361646eb9d88b1f957ada52e~mv2.jpg
1152 ms
8b3e05_08bb6937126f40d4884afc144338f932~mv2.png
1246 ms
8b3e05_f7e81c716a384324bffdb618e4380df6~mv2.png
1234 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
5 ms
bolt-performance
16 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
5 ms
right-arrow.svg
11 ms
WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff
3 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff
4 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff
4 ms
fileheads.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
fileheads.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
fileheads.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fileheads.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fileheads.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
fileheads.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Fileheads. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: