3.5 sec in total
48 ms
2.5 sec
919 ms
Click here to check amazing Filemail content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about filemail.no
Send large files free via email and links. Paid accounts share files of any size. Fast secure online file transfer using our file sharing site & apps.
Visit filemail.noWe analyzed Filemail.no page load time and found that the first response time was 48 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
filemail.no performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
50/100
10%
Value3.0 s
77/100
25%
Value3.5 s
88/100
10%
Value320 ms
76/100
30%
Value0.039
100/100
15%
Value6.6 s
58/100
10%
48 ms
425 ms
638 ms
461 ms
101 ms
Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Filemail.no, 86% (37 requests) were made to Filemail.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Analytics.filemail.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (812 ms) relates to the external source Filemail.com.
Page size can be reduced by 285.2 kB (12%)
2.5 MB
2.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Filemail.no main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 234.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 234.6 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 50.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Filemail images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 221 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 369 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Filemail.no needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 369 B or 36% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
37
37
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Filemail. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
filemail.no
48 ms
filemail.com
425 ms
www.filemail.com
638 ms
container_UpE19V8Y.js
461 ms
fontspreload.css
101 ms
30ad3d949c4d89c7cd03e17aa417f17ea7cf4cff08410ff576d0c3c1e876
500 ms
logo-horiz.svg
270 ms
logo.svg
372 ms
send-large-files.svg
591 ms
send-big-files.svg
506 ms
brands.png
468 ms
70f9ffdc04286bd32a8dd5ed45dbe4
474 ms
fa-light-300.woff
711 ms
matomo.php
380 ms
js
49 ms
Transferring-files-securely.svg
119 ms
Receiving-Large-Files.svg
196 ms
speed.png
146 ms
Requesting-files.svg
152 ms
tracking-file-sharing-activity.webp
202 ms
compliant-file-sharing.webp
240 ms
Integrate-file-upload-form.webp
246 ms
automatic-download.svg
252 ms
customization-and-branding.webp
297 ms
send-large-files-desktop.2x.png
306 ms
send-large-files-outlook.2x.png
765 ms
send-large-files-iphone-ipad.2x.png
636 ms
send-large-files-android.2x.png
639 ms
integrated-uploader-to-transfer-large-files.2x.png
685 ms
branding-emails-transfer-large-files.2x.png
593 ms
api-for-transferring-large-files.2x.png
408 ms
max-score.png
510 ms
almost-max-score.png
611 ms
austrian-film-commission.png
694 ms
british-film-institute.png
713 ms
bullhouse-media.png
736 ms
clear-channel-logo.png
738 ms
college-of-legal-practice.png
786 ms
discovery-channel-2019.png
793 ms
spare-bank.svg
812 ms
127.0.0.1
17 ms
127.0.0.1
8 ms
sprite.png
760 ms
filemail.no accessibility score
filemail.no best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
filemail.no SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Filemail.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Filemail.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
filemail.no
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Filemail. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: